Anonymous ID: fafabc Aug. 14, 2023, 2:42 p.m. No.19358527   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8611 >>8689 >>8746 >>8791 >>8796 >>8930 >>9192

Report: Engineers Discover Nationwide Cellular Network Connects Election Equipment and Gives Federal Government Access to Election Systems at Precinct Level

 

A growing majority of Americans know the 2020 election was fraudulent. Many analysts who have been studying election integrity have concluded that there had to be a two-way connection between local election electronics (electronic poll pads, tabulators, election management systems, voter databases, etc.) and a centralized data collection system responsible for monitoring and manipulating the election. Fingers have rightly been pointed at all-inclusive election management software, the Albert Sensor system, Scytl and Edison, and the Election Infrastructure Information Sharing and Analysis Center (EI-ISAC).

 

This incestuous collaboration between the Department of Homeland Security, the Election Assistance Commission, leftist/globalist funding, foreign companies, and their private partners, allowed for the real-time monitoring of all election data, and more importantly, the ability to change the results.

 

While experts could understand the functional capabilities of how these programs manipulate elections at the county and state levels, one area of mystery remained. Experts could not fully explain how systems within individual precincts which are supposedly “air-gapped” were adding votes in real-time – such as KnowInk poll pads in Texas that added hundreds of votes to the 2022 midterm election after the polls had closed. To accomplish election fraud at individual polling places, it is necessary to have an air-interface with the supposedly “air-gapped” equipment networked at the polling place.

 

A year-long research project led by an election integrity investigator from Utah, Sophie Anderson, and communications engineer, Dr. Charles Bernardin, has uncovered the mechanism that is being used to connect our election equipment at polling places across the nation. Anderson and Bernardin met while working together in several overlapping election integrity efforts. After submitting a countless number of public documents requests from multiple federal, state, and local governments, and working with other grassroots researchers, the team realized that the federal government has indeed created a nationwide network that is capable of collecting and changing real-time voting data at polling places across the country from a central location. The private network tool is called FirstNet, and like so many things that have proven detrimental to American liberty – it was sold as a tool to ensure public safety.

 

WHAT IS FIRSTNET?

 

The idea of a national cellular network dedicated to public safety was hatched in the wake of 9/11 when congested cell networks proved to be a bottleneck for first responders. In 2012, Congress created the First Responder Network Authority under the Department of Commerce to oversee the build-out of “FirstNet.” The original intent provided by its sponsors was that FirstNet would serve police, fire, and EMT services. However, the scope was soon expanded to include all “critical infrastructure” – which included water, energy, and transportation infrastructure. (https://www.digi.com/solutions/by-technology/firstnet )

 

Curiously, just days before Barack Obama left office, his administration’s Department of Homeland Security used the specter of “Russian interference” in the 2016 election as an excuse to declare election systems to be a part of that critical infrastructure. As a result, the stage was set to roll election systems into FirstNet.

 

The original plan to build FirstNet was to create a separate network with nationwide coverage that used a dedicated cellular band portion known as Band 14. Years and billions of dollars later, AT&T had built out the FirstNet Band 14 network with the coverage shown in the map below.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/08/report-nationwide-cellular-network-connects-election-equipment-gives/

Anonymous ID: fafabc Aug. 14, 2023, 2:45 p.m. No.19358542   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8683 >>8689 >>8791 >>8930 >>9192

Biden Admin Releases Diversity Guidance for Colleges After Supreme Court’s Affirmative Action Ruling

 

President Joe Biden’s administration is circulating new guidance for how colleges and universities can promote diversity after a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision striking down race-based affirmative action admission policies.

 

In June, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) v. Harvard that race-based affirmative action at colleges and universities is unconstitutional. President Biden was quick to register his disagreement with the court’s decision.

 

On Monday, Associate Attorney General Vanita Gupta announced the Department of Justice and Department of Education would begin circulating a cover letter and Q&A document (pdf) that instructs institutions of higher education on how they can still factor race into their admissions policies.

 

While the decision in SFFA v. Harvard bans colleges and universities from using an applicant’s race as a direct factor in their admissions policies, the new DOJ-DOE guidance describes certain scenarios where an applicant’s racial or ethnic background could still come up.

Federal Guidance

 

The Q&A document states that “universities may continue to embrace appropriate considerations through holistic application-review processes and (for example) provide opportunities to assess how applicants’ individual backgrounds and attributes—including those related to their race, experiences of racial discrimination, or the racial composition of their neighborhoods and schools—position them to contribute to campus in unique ways.”

 

The guidance document described specific permissible admissions scenarios, such as a university considering an application that describes what it meant for the applicant “to become the first black violinist in their city’s youth orchestra,” or “how an applicant conquered her feelings of isolation as a Latina student at an overwhelmingly white high school to join the debate team.”

 

The DOJ-DOE document further stated that colleges and universities may use admissions practices that consider “the full range of circumstances a student has faced in achieving their accomplishments, including financial means and broader socioeconomic status; information about the applicant’s neighborhood and high school; and experiences of adversity, including racial discrimination.”

 

The DOJ-DOE document also states that the Supreme Court decision “does not require institutions to ignore race” in their recruiting and outreach programs, “provided that their outreach and recruitment programs do not provide targeted groups of prospective students preference in the admissions process, and provided that all students—whether part of a specifically targeted group or not—enjoy the same opportunity to apply and compete for admission.”

 

The document goes so far as to say colleges and universities “may direct outreach and recruitment efforts toward schools and school districts that serve predominantly students of color and students of limited financial means.”

 

https://www.ntd.com/biden-admin-releases-diversity-guidance-for-colleges-after-supreme-courts-affirmative-action-ruling_936301.html

 

https://www.ntd.com/assets/uploads/2023/08/id936309-post-sffa_resource_faq_final_508.pdf

Anonymous ID: fafabc Aug. 14, 2023, 2:50 p.m. No.19358563   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8689 >>8791 >>8930 >>9192

Australia’s cyber spy agency has been drawn into the widening KPMG scandal after awarding a $46 million contract to the consulting giant despite knowing it had inside information it could exploit from an earlier stage of the project.

 

The lucrative work for the Australian Signals Directorate on the multi-billion-dollar REDSPICE program was won following a competitive tender, with the contract details quietly published on Friday.

 

Last week the firm was awarded a total of 18 federal government contracts worth almost $70 million, including $21 million in work with the Department of Defence.

 

KPMG is under pressure after the ABC's Four Corners program revealed whistleblower claims that it had ripped off taxpayers by submitting inflated invoices and billed Defence for work never done.

 

Over recent years, KPMG has dominated the defence and national security space in Canberra, but its latest contract win has been controversial as the firm helped design the ASD project and was then allowed to bid for its implementation.

 

This is known in consulting circles as "marking your own homework", as KPMG would have gained intimate knowledge of what the ASD upgrade required, having spent the previous two years helping the agency design the project.

 

A recent Auditor-General report revealed probity advice to the government that said incumbent consultants had an "unfair advantage" in this situation, as they had "access to inside information" and there was, at the very least, a "perceived conflict of interest".

 

Deloitte was excluded in 2020 from bidding on a Home Affairs contract, after earlier advising the department on the same project.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-08-15/spy-agency-caught-up-in-kpmg-scandal/102728874