Anonymous ID: 798e02 Aug. 14, 2023, 6:51 p.m. No.19359969   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9984

>>19359927 fragile egg-o

>>19359936

@pendizzy6352

@pendizzy6352

3 months ago

Rotten egg.

@ballbagchris6920

@ballbagchris6920

8 months ago

This really CRACKED me up

 

 

@kareliaescobar8123

@kareliaescobar8123

10 months ago

He didnt need to answer

That.

Why ask that type of question

I will get up and do the same.

 

@Meladjusted

8 months ago

Um. Are you serious? Why do people feel the need to say things as if they're experts when they very obviously don't have the first clue what they're going on about?

In a legal case setting where they have a potential sexual predator v. accusers, such things are more than relevant.

 

If you're being charged with sexual predation and your accusers can give unique identifying information about your genitalia, that's SUCH damning evidence and is completely admissable. A woman he claims not to know who had her encounter with him in her teens shouldn't know what his genitals look like in detail, correct?

 

Sometimes this type of info is mole locations, other times it's just unique features of the genitalia itself, but this is absolutely beyond routine info in such cases. He just thinks he's above such questioning. The lawyer probably should have framed the question as "[accuser] gave testimony stating that your pโ‚ฌni$ has an ovalโ€”or 'egg'โ€”shapeโ€ฆ" but there's definitely nothing wrong with the line of questioning.

If he hadn't been merked by the feds, his genitals would have been photographed for evidence in the trial to match to the testimony to show that the woman had seen it. Same thing happened in the Michael Jackson case.

 

If you don't want to be asked and bothered about your egg diยฉk, don't rape and procure underage girls for people. ๐Ÿคท๐Ÿผโ€โ™€๏ธ

@lisabethryan9876

10 months ago

sounds like an uncircumcised chubby..lol

 

@Nik_heliumhearts

@Nik_heliumhearts

10 months ago

How fragile the ego of the psychopath.

Anonymous ID: 798e02 Aug. 14, 2023, 6:52 p.m. No.19359984   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>19359746

>>19359927

>>19359969

 

@mizm1186

10 months ago

@sabias3932 Oh no! He shouldn't be excused and with the crimes he was accused of what better way to prove that he was exposed, to say it mildly, to the woman or women who gave a description? I don't believe that people who have committed such vile crimes should be given any special consideration or be excused from uncomfortable situations.

6

Reply

@amyb7823

@amyb7823

10 months ago

I wouldn't feel badly for this guy. He deserved it, he used that filthy tiny penis to violate and abuse poor young girls. Taking advantage of young girls who probably didn't have the best home life or upbringing and who probably had already been thru some crappy life circumstances. Then here comes Mr. Epstein, a wolf in sheeps clothing. A manipulating, calculating, small penised sicko. So yeah, I know I certainly don't feel badly that the one questioning him in this deposition was low key trying to humiliate this As*hole for being a child predator and for severely traumatizing and abusing countless young girls. Can you even imagine being a poor young 14 year old girl and having to have sex with a gross old man like him? That is traumatizing to even think about.