Imagine all the Soros Crime family plantation slave African American DAs and AGs VOICES, their SPEECH, was instead mouthed by white nazis with german accents. Imagine the same exact words, but sounding like 'dictatorial' voices that the world has seen in movies and television shows for decades.

What would people think then? Well, regardless of what the world thinks, this Anon doesn't get tricked with the same words and lies 'hidden' behind 'protected groups' to trick people into believing they have to choose between accepting the lies as truth or else you're racist against the speaker. This Anon only sees vicious racists going after Trump.

>>19364977

Anon is well versed in all the drops, and in no drop does anything Anon wrote get 'destroyed', IMO.

Your 'interpretation' of the drops are yours and yours alone.

>>19364979

So you admit that the only reason you're 'pointing out' the ethnicity of a person, for some 'coincidence' it's only when jewish, never when it's anyone else, is to foment and encourage 'kvetching' in people's minds, to foment conflict, distrust, disagreement, all to keep people blinded to the CONTROLLERS of the very same narrative you're posting here and not on a dedicated muhjoo board on 8kun.

You're more concerned about what Anons on QR think and what the world sees posted here. You want to have muhjoo spam here out of all places.

You wrote:

>you still can't mention he's Jewish.

This is a dialectic projection of your own inconsistent logic that seeks to replace individual responsibility with collective innocence and collective guilt.

You say Anon 'still can't mention Soros is Jewish'. But you still can't mention Soros is a human being with the same logical structure of mind as every other human being, but as an individual chose his path just like every other individual chose their path.

You still can't treat people as individual human beings, because when that happens, YOUR OWN CORRUPT INDIVIDUALITY is more easily detected, because then you'd have to prove and disprove ideas on merit of the message alone, where the background of Anon is irrelevant to what is and is not true or false.

YOU CAN'T WIN when the rules are consistent for all individuals, where everyone's background is private and the only information you have to work with are the messages themselves.

That's why you're here trying to divide Anon into conflicting 'tribes'. You can't win on message alone, so you try to win by TARGETED a priori smears and slanders of Anon's background, where if they don't play your evil game, then they are somehow guilty of NOT saying the 'required' speech.

The deep state wants to censor Anons, and shills on QR want to smear Anons into compelled 'what Anons are 'supposed' to be seen as saying' speech.

None of that shit works on autists.

You have no fucking clue of the background of any Anon and that burns you up because you know you can't win when the digital playground is immune from 'bloodlin' collectivist inconsistent pre-digital logic.