>>1937043

How could Mueller and his SC be investigating the cabal if the SC is stacked with deeply conflicted HRC-connected operatives? How likely do you think it is it that all the SC team would flip (and stay flipped) against their former cabal allies long enough to investigate them?

I think the maximum that can be hoped for from Mueller and his SC is that Trump, et al are using them as a relatively toothless distraction/stalling device so Sessions, Horowitz and Huber get their 35,000 or so ducks in a row. That and as a way to further discredit the Dems by exposing their reliably crooked tactics to a mass audience.

What do you think, could the Mueller team really be anti-HRC?

>>1937247

If true, this is nothing to brag about, statusfag. You've got little to nothing to show for supposed year since you're getting clowned on the professional requirements/history of Supreme Court justices by anons you claim are uneducated.