>>1936548
Sure, but they are becoming less ambiguous.
Yes, but does Q mean, "should we add this traitorous controlled op to the list after we forced him out?" Or does he mean,"Shall I add Gowdy to the list? He just so happened to have freed up his calendar of other commitments…"
You misunderstood. "Shall we add him to the list?" could be a SARCASTIC reference to adding him to the scotus list. Q references Gowdy choosing to resign from political office. This could be interpreted as Gowdy was forced to step aside because he is corrupt, and Q is asking sarcastically if we should make this corrupt guy a SCOTUS contender. On the other hand, you could take it at face value. At face value, it would seem that Gowdy freed himself up to be nominated, as Kennedy resigning now was planned, and Gowdy was always going to be a possible nominee. All part of the plan. I think the latter is more likely, but the former is possible.
Yeah his seeming support for Mueller was very fishy. Either he is Trump team and setting things up, or he was always controlled op and is coming out as such now. I think he is Trump team. I watched him in some of the Benghazi hearings and other times too. He is either a great actor on point at all times, or he is legitimately a passionate patriot. Very hard to fake. If he is legit, and kept trying through the Obama years with no hope or support in sight, he is a warrior. The perfect pick.
Care to elaborate?
You might be right. On the other hand, pre-trump he had no support. He couldnt do anything but talk because he was alone. Then again, he might be legitimately worthless. Time will tell I suppose.