Anon you're responding to is one of the new shills.
He's never seen the 'navy seal' copypasta which is spammed on here constantly.
You bring up a good point.
We need to find the actual connection..not just using the article.
Anon you're responding to is one of the new shills.
He's never seen the 'navy seal' copypasta which is spammed on here constantly.
You bring up a good point.
We need to find the actual connection..not just using the article.
only difference btwn yournewswire article and dailymail article is the 'did work for' vs 'might have worked for'.
Not feeling good about this.
Calling a signature gatherer a 'campaign official' might be a stretch.