a new implied rule when posting about those who think that they are our overlords: though shall not post words that rhyme with words that the media doesn't want you using.
RIGGERS is now listed by mainstream media as being a bad word.
some is missing from your statement.
others? not so much.
not everyone becomes an immoral flunky when blackmailed.
some take the hit, confess their sins, and move on with their lives.
you're not Q
false
the rules are well known about who we can say is Q and you are what is called a 'confirmation shill'. NO it is not Q!
your false statement is still false even though you slander me and call me a shill
you don't need to echo what I said, but yes, it is NOT NEW Q and it wasn't posted by Q here today.
the board is under heavy attack.
there are reports of MAGA in the news and acting like people are criminals because of what shills do.
a sense of humor in such situations is ripe for intentional misinterpretation echoed out to people who don't know about us.
Chuckle-headed idiocy, while it may be fun for you, when you're time-releases are popping off in your head is not fun for those of us who haunt and lurk when you're popping off what you claim is humor here, during a shill-storm.
wise up or label your stuff as either 'satire' or 'dry humor'.
TY in advance.
ah, you mean when blackmailed by the Cabal. . .
I was making a statement about blackmail in general.
dude, the rules here are different now.
the real anon don't do the pejorative word vomit putdown thing anymore when someone challanges them or answers their posts.
the whole 'F-word, I'm the dominant' bit, that you are doing, is deprecated and it's a tell
that you're a paid agitator.
ya, I thought someone might misunderstand that but you used a word that begins with 'F' and that is the one I meant, not the one you said.
my point: what you do is agitation and you're here to be sand-paper on the skin.
as I said what you do is a 'tell' as to what you are here to do.
the whole "I'm Don Rickles" bit doesn't work here, agitator.
PS: Don was actually very sweet when he realized he'd gone too far with what he did.
you thinking and posting that I 'must be new' says that about you . . .
a description of what I see as effective and ineffective behavior here is not be being a dictator and saying what people should and should not do.
they can do what they want and continue to come-off as ineffective agitators, that is their choice.
most people will filter then and the very quick-on-the-trigger BV will perhaps delete all their posts.
the idea that a discussion of effective methods is 'controlling' is an attempt by you to do the same by shaming me.
but I don't fall for it, and I see what you are doing.
and I post about it, and that bugs you. why?
my 'feelz' are not in view.
a discussion of ineffective tactics of chuckle-heads is appropriate given the serious and litigious nature of the current dictatorship in Washington who use words as nooses and believe that Free Speech is a thing of the past and will apply the law unequally.
you should use what you say to me as your rule, let me repeat what you said and apply it to yourself:
"If you got a problem with my post you are equipped with a filter. Stop acting like a pussy."
you can keep doing as you do, that's your right.
you'll be filtered and perhaps deleted by the trigger happy BV.
there it is, the pejoratative agitation that is an instant filter for most people who lurk here.
I get to the first slur and my mind just stops me from reading further.
and thus I conclude you're not an effective communicator.