you are the type who never does anything except for after the fact you blame everyone else for 'violation' of 'their sacred oath'.
sounds very shilly to me.
you are the type who never does anything except for after the fact you blame everyone else for 'violation' of 'their sacred oath'.
sounds very shilly to me.
>>19375527
to be fair you have no idea what their noses look like, mister capital letters
the logic you used here is so very flawed that I can't imagine you don't know that.
the accuser.
it's the form of 'someone else did something horrible and it's your fault because I make up stuff in my head, why don't you love children'
how can you do this with a straight face?
and a confirmation shill mocks Q further.
your show is not enjoyable nor will it be in two weeks or ever, mocking-shill
"">That's because the United States is a secular government that practices religious tolerance.""
no, the US Gov is currently a partial dictatorship and has a thing for going after religious Christians. Did you not see the court rulling yesterday by a judge that said that the DC-dicatorship enforced the law differently for the pro-life crowd than they did for their political allies in the 'matters' movements?
>>19375597
incorrect
in a dictatorship, even a partial one like is current, those who want to survive try to blend in.
they don't go on rooftops and start screaming, the nest in and try to be come invisible to the tyrants so that they don't get targeted.
They survive, they lower their expectations, they reduce their financial exposure to the acts of the tyrants, they try to blend in so that they can survive through it.
and they pray for Justice.