Robert Lucifer [P]ETERS?
THE FBI BROKE INTO ANOTHER HOUSE YESTERDAY AND KILLED THE OCCUPANT
TN as well
Poasted in last bread
this time in Tennessee
I had to read the article twice before realizing this was about a different incident than the FBI killing of Craig Robertson in Utah
https://wbbjtv.com/2023/08/16/1-killed-in-fbi-involved-shooting-neighbor-shares-what-he-saw/
Image
2:02 AM · Aug 17, 2023
https://twitter.com/stephenehorn/status/1692159926477480307
BILLIONAIRES WANT AN ISLAND WHEN WE ARE HAVING CLIMATE CHANGE. That tell me they are safe place and the storms will not rise as glaciers melt.
They are full of shit, everytime they open their nasty mouths.
And yeah, we all know why islands are important to them.
>How tech billionaires with property in Hawaii are responding to Maui wildfires
>The devastating wildfires that have ravaged Maui have prompted billionaire tech moguls who have bought wide swaths of property in Hawaii to pitch in with charitable donations to help rebuild the devastated town of Lahaina.
>Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, and PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel have all paid eight- and nine-figure sums to acquire land and property on the archipelago.
>Bezos, who paid a reported $78 million for a 14-acre compound on Maui, has committed to the creation of a $100 million fund to help the island “get back on its feet,” his fiancée, Lauren Sanchez, wrote in a recent Instagram post.
>Zuckerberg’s wife, Priscilla Chan, announced on Facebook that the couple was donating an unspecific amount of money.
>The Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative, the charity founded by the couple, cut a check for $400,000 to the Hawaii Community Foundation’s Maui Strong Fund, according to Fortune.
>The Hawaii Community Foundation has also received $500,000 from Pierre Omidyar, the eBay founder whose net worth is estimated by Bloomberg at $9.36 billion.
>Omidyar’s donation was reported by Philanthropy News Digest.
>https://nypost.com/2023/08/17/how-tech-billionaires-who-own-owns-on-hawaii-are-giving-to-maui-wildfire-relief/
Anons we need to help the defense come up with the word, we can do this.
Breathing, Heart beating,able,suckling,moving, non aborted, living, eyes blinking
And pray for the defense.
>DC FACE trial: Pro-life defense not allowed to say ‘infanticide,’ ‘abortion,’ or ‘innocent lives’
>The judge has preemptively excluded all arguments that the defense might level related to the morality of abortion and its legality.
>In a criminal trial I thought it was the job of the defense to argue in any way they thought reasonable to defend their client in court. I also thought it was the job of the jury to adjudicate the truth of the arguments offered by each side; and that it was the job of the judge to assure as much as possible that impartial jurors be selected to adjudicate whether the guilt of the defendants has been proven or not, and to impartially oversee the procedural progress of the trial.
>Such, however, does not seem to have been the understanding of the judge in the present FACE Act trial in Washington D.C. in which charges of conspiracy and violations of a federal statute – a statute dependent upon the now-overturned Roe v. Wade and designed to assure at the federal level access to abortion facilities – are being leveled against nine pro-lifers, who sought to rescue the unborn from the untimely death of abortion.
>Yesterday, while I watched Day One of the trial unfold in the courtroom, the prosecution and defense made their opening statements and heard the first several witnesses that the prosecution brought to the case. If the selection of a predominantly pro-abortion jury – in a case in which the defendants have said they acted out of their conviction that abortion is the murder of the baby – were not already an indication that the verdict is essentially predetermined in this trial, then the continual objections of the prosecution during the opening statement of the defense, and the full cooperation of the judge in sustaining them, should indicate the guided direction in which this trial is going.
>https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/dc-face-trial-pro-life-defense-not-allowed-to-say-infanticide-abortion-or-innocent-lives/
Note: the officials want everyone to voluntarily give their dna. Just what we don't want to do. What will they do with dna of the people they burned out?
All the children that were home from school, how does that coinciide with the human traffickers, we assume want the land?