Anons check this out: I was looking up EO 13807. Here's a link:

https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/executive-order-13807-establishing-discipline-and-accountability-the-environmental-review

However, in my search this turned up. Pic related. Here's a link:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/20/executive-order-protecting-public-health-and-environment-and-restoring-science-to-tackle-climate-crisis/

Executive Order on Protecting Public Health and the Environment and Restoring Science to Tackle the Climate Crisis

I am not sure why Biden's hot mess turned up as the third result. Maybe an embedded reference to the Trump EO is the reason?

However, both EOs seem intriguing and worth a look. Why doesn't the Biden EO seem to have a number associated with it, or am I missing something.

>>19382309

>That's exactly where the Wildfire Danger Assessment plan says we can take out the properties we need."

Where did that apparent quote come from?

>>19382335

Guise, is this for real?!

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/20/executive-order-protecting-public-health-and-environment-and-restoring-science-to-tackle-climate-crisis/

Pics related.

>>19382376

Well, I'm gonna try to post the rest of this nonsense.

>>19382413

No mention of "We the People" as "stakeholders".

>>19382432

>>19382454

>>19382467

Guise, this was apparently his first or nearly first action as "President"