"The Source"…
The?
As in…everyone else isn't a source?
The only "source" that program is outputting is C_A op mockingbird propaganda.
Nolte: "Collins has all the appeal of a first wife."
There are burns, and then there are burns that raise the colloquial meaning of the phrase burn because calling this a burn is infinitely understated.
Ooof.
https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2023/07/25/nolte-report-cnn-leadership-unhappy-kaitlan-collins-her-dismal-ratings/
Anon cannot consistently regard self as 'the' source. "A" source is more consistent with truth if anon wants to be consistent with all other consciousnesses who receive whatever statements are sourced by this one among all.
It's never wrong to be labelled as wrong by any inconsistent source calling itself 'the' source, because any complex system displaying a pattern of repeat inconsistencies over time must be knowing deception because it's not physically/materially/spiritually/informationally possible for any complex system to consistently apply consistency wit…what was 'demanded' all the time in the past? Prove innocence by speaking 'our' way and not 'your' way.
.
A system with one inconsistency can prove to itself any statement is true, it is knowingly withholding a consistent by speech pattern motivation of its own statements, many instances happened already, including 'Russia hacked 2016 election' was presented 'as true' and any anon source inconsistent with that inconsistency in statement vs true/'proved' statements, are smeared as associated with….some other projection…of informational 'dictator' with other human being's innocence and guilt reality as it actually happens in time independent from inconsistent 'sources'.
Slurs of human beings by 'affiliation groups'…as defined by the very same source sourcing the accusations of how the flaws are in humanity by those logos speech patterns.
If the pattern of an inconsistent power source controlling national government a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z nodes of informational 'credibility' in how truth is arrived at what the public is smeared/intimidated into a system of self-directed 'distraction' by trusting the dialectic projection is to be the reality of the real of what is real in what people are to be intimidated into believing, lest and inconsistency with the inconsistency is targeted for annihilation in informational 'retaining' over time in objects of character assassinations…and worse.
It's not only not necessarily wrong to speak thoughts inconsistent with other speech from 'a' source of thoughts that are themselves having a pattern of inconsistency with truth as it is (opposite was true…accuser's political force illegally colluded with 'Russians'…as if speaking one word is supposed to fully describe any other complex system capable of basic arithmetic, and a loud false 'accuser' recently pled guilty to doing what they themselves are introducing narrative forms…inconsistent with each other directed by same source pulling government strings.
Karl Marx wrote that he believed in an 'inevitable' development to occur, the megalomaniacal hegel I am god logic as 'an inversion' of what allegedly occurred prior or simultaneously with but never what it is which is subsequent to true event a speech pattern of referencing self as divided as description of some 'force' directing 'earth' divided from 'paradise of life', life is smeared as an exile.
Project exile self-alienation to be trusted as what is driving human beings by this or that 'type' with 'differences' in narrative postured as more important than narratives of consistencies with itself.