I wonder if "Joel Davis" and "Arthur Davis" could be relatives? "Davis is a very common name, though, isn't it?
>>1939005 (pb)
where's the link to watch ya'll. No TV here.
>>1938537 (pb)
Right, but Scalia pressured the others. And wrote the shitty justification/winning opinion, which was a one-off "Never to Happen Again" Translation : Arbitrary Justice, done to get the result he wanted. He twisted the law. "Never to be done again" That is called improper. The only reason they got away with it is because they were the highest Court;and therefore it ended there. Also, Bushy's had control of Propaganda operation and next day started squeeling "Let it go" "Poor losers" and all that shit. The Propaganda News shut down cold the voices objecting. Within one day. Compare to what has been done to President Trump.
Now that was real election interference. And yes, Republicans are just as bad as Dems, since they didn't care about the rules as long as their guy won. Just as bad a club of cheaters as the Dems. Also, that incident foretold 9/11 and the out-right destruction of our Republic. [Though I know it was to be a process over a number of years] I was so glad to outlive Scalia. I wanted to know that he was dead, before I died. And I'm glad he died as he did, ignominiously - caught as a pedo.
If the bad guys killed him, all the better. Make a deal with the devil and that what happens, the devil turns on you.
If Pres. Trump had that machine - which they had to cover for Bush losing the election yet taking the White House, you'd hear nary a peep out of the assholes who have been screaming - for almost two years, as we've been subjected to.
And yes, they were all guilty of treason- the 5 who voted to install W Bush; but Scalia was the ring leader.
>>1936681 (pb)
>>1938537 (pb)
>>1938774 (pb)
>>1938781 (pb)
I can upload the Hadad video to the Anon files site? Is that linked at the top of the bread? Vid has lots of sauce and much work was put into deleting it from YouTube. There's a lot still up there on the subject, but I don't think the one I have is there anymore. And I'm not sure how good the others are nor if they are red herrings.
P.S. What was their "Equal Protection" argument?
kek
It was that ~:"Some people didn't get their vote counted, Their votes were thrown out by accident"
Therefore
~"It's unfair to those people who lost their votes to continue the vote count.
They love to use our promised rights against us. It's another Joker move. A slap in the face. They love it.
That and the "Help American Vote Act" where they installed the compromised electronic vote counting machines.
It's their being "funny"
>It's their being "funny"
IT's THEY'RE being funny, to themselves, and for their own insider crowd. a FEAT.
Scalia also argued that to continue the vote count would interfere with W. Bush's rights. [to be President]
The fuck-head 9/11 perp Ted Olsen argued the case.
no