Anonymous ID: 801156 Aug. 21, 2023, 5:37 p.m. No.19402379   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2399 >>2400 >>2406 >>2441 >>2476 >>2499 >>2529

Huma back in the news

Newly released email shows top aide Huma Abedin warned colleagues Hillary was 'often confused' and needed hand-holding about calls with foreign leaders

 

Hillary Clinton needed hand-holding with her daily schedule and was 'often confused' while she was secretary of state, her former top aide and 'body woman' Huma Adebin wrote a colleague in a January 2013 email.

 

'Have you been going over calls with her for tomorrow? So she knows singh [sic] ls at 8?' Abedin asked Hanley just before 5:00 p.m. on a Saturday.

 

'She was in bed for a nap by the time I heard that she had an 8am call,' Hanley replied three minutes later. 'Will go over with her.'

 

'Very imp[ortant] to do that. She's often confused,' Abedin told her.

 

It wasn't the first time Hanley had to keep up with Clinton's weekend sleeping schedule. In an email released by the State Department in May, she tried to reach the then-secretary of state four days after the deadly terror attacks in Benghazi, Libya.

 

Clinton missed a meeting at the White House for President Obama's daily national security briefing because she overslept.

 

Hanley emailed Clinton at 9:17 that morning to let her know that White House Senior Adviser Dan Pfeiffer' had 'some sensitive items that he would like to personally show you when he arrives.'

 

Clinton didn't reply until 10:43, hearly an hour and a half later.

 

'[J]ust woke up,' she told Hanley, 'so i [sic] missed Dan. Could he come back after [I] finish my calls?'

 

Judicial Watch, a right-leaning government transparency group, released the new Abedin email on Monday as a consequence of filing a Freedom Of Information Act lawsuit against the State Department.

 

The group had demanded to see all 'emails of official State Department business received or sent by former Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin from January 1, 2009 through February 1, 2013 using a non-“state.gov” email address.'

 

The 35 pages of emails released Monday include detailed schedules of Clinton's high-level phone calls – and her movements.

 

The detailed schedules also contain a warning: 'The information contained in this email is not to be shared, forwarded or duplicated.'

 

One of them was a minute-by-minute schedule for Hillary's day on January 31, 2013.

 

But Abedins email threads lived on Hillary Clinton's private email server, not on her official 'state.gov' acdress. Abedin had a private account through the 'clintonemails.com' domain.

Moar in link:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3320900/Newly-released-email-shows-aide-Huma-Abedin-warned-colleagues-Hillary-confused-needed-hand-holding-calls-foreign-leaders.html?repost=repost

 

2 Clips in article.

1st Huma Albedin Arriving for Bengazi Hearing in October 2015: 17 seconds long

 

2nd Hilary Boards Private Jet After Green Group Endorsment: 32 Seconds Long.

32=23

Anonymous ID: 801156 Aug. 21, 2023, 5:46 p.m. No.19402441   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2498

>>19402379

Drop 45

Follow Huma.

What just broke w/ Huma?

>Newly released emails re: HRC "often confused" "Overslept"

What did HRC instruct Huma to do re: Classified markings?

Why is this story just now coming out?

>To make HRC appear mentally incompetent? Shits getting real?

What relevance does it have?

 

Why is Donna running for cover?

Was a deal granted in exchange for something?

Who made the deal?

Do we care about Donna or those who instructed her to violate the law?

Why is this being leaked v. simply prosecuted privately?

Who is attempting to change the narrative and soften the acts that are forthcoming this weekend?

Anonymous ID: 801156 Aug. 21, 2023, 5:52 p.m. No.19402476   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2498

>>19402379

Drop 45

Follow Huma.

What just broke w/ Huma?

>Newly released emails re: HRC "often confused" "Overslept"

What did HRC instruct Huma to do re: Classified markings?

Why is this story just now coming out?

>To make HRC appear mentally incompetent? Shits getting real?

What relevance does it have?

 

Why is Donna running for cover?

Was a deal granted in exchange for something?

Who made the deal?

Do we care about Donna or those who instructed her to violate the law?

Why is this being leaked v. simply prosecuted privately?

Who is attempting to change the narrative and soften the acts that are forthcoming this weekend?

 

Didn't DJT poast a TRUTH with Sleep,Sleep,Sleep recently?