MasonAnon, I respect your noble intentions and efforts. It's a good thing to redpill those at the lower levels in your lodges, and I'm sure you can give out some cursory information that anons here will find interesting.

But the stuff that would be of extreme relevance, interest, smoking gun, etc. is not available to a 32nd degree Mason, and depending on certain factors, not available to a 33rd degree Mason. Maybe you've heard rumblings, but there are two branches of the 33rd degree. The Masons have systems of identifying your loyalties and beliefs and you will be sorted into one of the two branches if you become a 33rd degree Mason.

If you are not a "true believer," it will be very hard hard if not impossible for you to be sorted into the most esoteric branch.

Those who have been sorted into that branch understand that there are more than 33 degrees.

Think about why the Masons chose to use "degrees" to denote ranks within their organization.

They use a compass in their primary symbolism, yes?

How many degrees does a compass measure?

How many degrees are there REALLY?

The big stuff happens far above the head of a 32nd degree Mason, and even far above the head of a 33rd degree Mason who has noble intentions, such as yourself.

The truth about these upper degrees is out there. Materials have been leaked.

But the big secrets anons are likely looking for are not going to be here.

I don't mean to say the information isn't good or interesting to read.

I mean this as a road sign to more digging for those who are now engaging with this topic.

>>2283711

My opinion is that the organization should be outlawed. I am completely empathetic to the good hearted people there who take pleasure and comfort in a men's group.

But the founder and founding purpose to me is despicable enough to warrant its elimination.

Other groups can form for the benefits, without all the baggage.

>>2284085

Have you read Manly P Hall's own writings on Freemasonry?

I recommend searching for 360 degree mason whistle-blowers if you want to know specifics on the organization.

Old hits are good, but I for the most part don't tend to point people towards easier means of eating from the tree of occulted knowledge. It'll find you.

I do support exposing the people who used that knowledge against us and brainwash people into siding with the serpent and his pursuits over the one who warned us from the serpent.

>>2285681

It was founded with sinister intentions by sinister people. The narrative that it was infiltrated is incorrect.

>>2286033

If your father was a good man, most 3rd degree Masons only participate in Freemasonry for the bonding and community. Knowledgeable corruption is at the higher levels.

While I would strongly discourage you from joining a lodge yourself, it is most likely your father never knew anything beyond a somewhat exclusive social club.