Anonymous ID: c5ae27 Aug. 22, 2023, 8:34 a.m. No.19405744   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5877

>>19405733

 

The cult has been funding this garbage logic since at least the 1930s.

Poor bastards.

 

"Neither the Marxians nor the racists nor the supporters of any other brand of polylogism ever went further than to declare that the logical structure of mind is different with various classes, races, or nations. They never ventured to demonstrate precisely in what the logic of the proletarians differs from the logic of the bourgeois, or in what the logic of the Aryans differs from the logic of the non-Aryans, or the logic of the Germans from the logic of the French or the British. In the eyes of the Marxians the Ricardian theory of comparative cost is spurious because Ricardo was a bourgeois. The German racists condemn the same theory because Ricardo was a Jew, and the German nationalists because he was an Englishman. Some German professors advanced all these three arguments together against the validity of Ricardo's teachings. However, it is not enough to reject a theory wholesale by unmasking the background of its author. What is wanted is first to expound a system of logic different from that applied by the criticized author. Then it would be necessary to examine the contested theory point by point and to show where in its reasoning inferences are made whichalthough correct from the point of view of its author's logicare invalid from the point of view of the proletarian, Aryan, or German logic. And finally, it should be explained what kind of conclusions the replacement of the author's vicious inferences by the correct inferences of the critic's own logic must [p. 76] lead to. As everybody knows, this never has been and never can be attempted by anybody."

 

https://mises.org/library/human-action-0/html/pp/657

Anonymous ID: c5ae27 Aug. 22, 2023, 8:57 a.m. No.19405877   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19405744

"A consistent supporter of polylogism would have to maintain that ideas are correct because their author is a member of the right class, nation, or race. But consistency is not one of their virtues. Thus the Marxians are prepared to assign the epithet "proletarian thinker" to everybody whose doctrines they approve. All the others they disparage either as foes of their class or as social traitors. Hitler was even frank enough to admit that the only method available for him to sift the true Germans from the mongrels and the aliens was to enunciate a genuinely German program and to see who were ready to support it.5 A dark-haired man whose bodily features by no means fitted the prototype of the fair-haired Aryan master race, arrogated to himself the gift of discovering the only doctrine adequate to the German mind and of expelling from the ranks of the Germans all those who did not accept this doctrine whatever their bodily characteristics might be. No further proof is needed of the insincerity of the whole doctrine."

Anonymous ID: c5ae27 Aug. 22, 2023, 10:30 a.m. No.19406206   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19405593

>https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12430163/Oliver-Anthonys-Rich-Men-North-Richmond-storms-No-1-Billboard-Hot-100-chart-besting-Elvis-Beatles-debut-success.html

 

>‘Thirty years from now Taylor Swift will be remembered as the Millennial Barry Manilow,’ tweeted James Jay Carafano of the Heritage Foundation think tank

 

kek

Anonymous ID: c5ae27 Aug. 22, 2023, 10:40 a.m. No.19406253   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19406235

No, not kidding, deadly serious.

>past saturation point

That's really referencing your own tolerance for having your frail ego bruised.

Your anger 'gfy' is just your envy and jealousy talking, nothing more.

Anonymous ID: c5ae27 Aug. 22, 2023, 10:43 a.m. No.19406273   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19406266

Anons are good at detecting patterns based on content which always in every instance reflects the author's psychology.

You're a bigot too, filtered you right back.

Anonymous ID: c5ae27 Aug. 22, 2023, 10:47 a.m. No.19406298   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19406287

"I wish politicians would look out for minors, and not just minors on an island somewhere."

Anon was only referencing this. This is what all Anons agree with.