>>19409693

looks like yet another psyop.

how do you know that the picture isn't photo shopped.

current psyop that is running, and snarl shills attacking all skeptics, is that 'they' burned out everyone in a land grab.

but the fire is easily explained through bad management and poor maintenance.

but 'they' want anon saying things like 'water board with gasoline' and then attack people who point out that is a subhuman suggestion.

'they' want anon to seem to be reactionary, to believe innuendos as if they are facts, to be ready to do vigilanti justice and why?

so they can say 'see what a threat anon are, go arrest them'.

if you cheer on the sub human suggestions of doing things to famous people based upon false accusations and innuendo then you are being played and put your self at risk of being a deep state target.

support rule of law and rules of evidence.

don't believe photo shopped fakes and Monopoly game piece looking monochromatic photoshopping. understand that most posts these last few days here have been shills trying to make anon seem like reactionaries.

>>19409747

In the moden day it seems that the only people using the term 'the masses' are either socialist stooges or useful idiots.

>>19409776

bad people like to cause distress, and feed off of the pain. They get off on causing harm and enjoy the suffering of those who they hate.

they hate President Trump and want him to suffer.

>>19409786

>>19409786

this one says one thing and then shows another.

he pretends that he supports an 'OK to be . . . ' and mentions an ethnicity he imagines.

then he shows a picture with someone with a ridiculous amount of armaments, a parody persona, a stooge in a get up.

the picture conflicts with the it's 'OK to be . . . ' statement.

it's the form of an 'ironic mocker' who thinks others are stupid and won't notice the incongruity.

>>19409804

we should believe you why?

no, you're just a conformence shill supporting the monopoly piece house theory that is being conjectured around to accuse people of BS.

all the hotels are painted Red and the houses are all Green because . . . muh-psy-op that it wasn't negligence but mass murder that caused the fire.

>>19409821

>>19409821

the image of the parady soldier is incongruent with the message.

It's a person mocking any 'it's OK to be . . . whatever' effort by showing a fool who wouldn't be useful on the field of battle NOT being OK but being a fool.

if you can't see it, I can't make you see it. I point it out.

I point out what seems obvious to me. If you're fooled and you think that post that I pointed out wasn't mocking others, then what can I do to make you see it? say 'I could be wrong'?

I could say that but that would be me just pandering to your pretense of not knowing that what I say has a ring of truth to it.

>>19409856

my doctor's pyschitrists lawyers accountant told his hair dressers house cleaners podiatrist that your mother's dentists wig salesman said the same thing.

everyone should believe them because psyops are always true when it's a chain of innuendo, right?

end satire

>>19409871

no, you're the one who isn't. why? because you're supporting an active psyop and excusing the ridicule that they make obvious.

the ridicule that is done here is usually obvious. You pretend that it's all above board, so you're part of the psyop.

filter me, what does it matter.

>>19409893

this is far fetched as the Constitution prohibits anyone from conducting foreign policy or signing treaties except through the central government, ratified by Congress, and signed by the President.

anyone else signing treaties is violating the constitution.

>>19409936

there is another possibility:

the people were all 'on welfare'

and monies were spent for them and they were givne all kinds of free stuff, housing and food stamps and health insurance, and the voted and got all kinds of federal subsidies

but . . .

they were fake, no one was real.

the adults all voted, the children all got federal subsidies, but none of them really existed.

and so they are missing and there is no evidence and no one looking for them because they were never real in the first place.

I know its far fetched, but I wouldn't put it past the marxists to do such, to cook the voter roles and get a lot of free federal dollars to spend on themselves.

schools with no one really in them

housing that no one lives in.

voters who all vote

>>19409997

maybe the town was a fraude, with far fewer people than listed.

When I went to LA I thought 'how can there really be so many millions of people here, it's a fucking wasteland'

and yet you look at the census and huge huge numbers are listed.

it it were true that a lot of the welfare neighborhoods were really ghost towns, that had thousands of listed voters, and huge subsidies, then if it all burned down thousands and thousands would be listed as missing, but those people never really existed so there wouldn't be any real casualties.

Far fetched, of course. But the greed of those who profiteer off of the welfare system means that someone probably thought of it and perhaps has tried to pull it off. Like the plot of a novel.

far fetch, yes, conjecture , yes, but given how corrupt governance can become, it wouldn't be too far fetched. Think of the power and money if you could have a million person city with only really 100,000 people in it.

you'd get a couple of congressmen, you'd get huge subsidies. you could spend down all the welfare.

be paid for housing that no one lives in.

grants for schools that no one attends.

on and on and live for free.

(it's fictional conjecture , of course, but it would explain why no one is looking for people who all supposedly died in a fire)

>>19410062

"Love is Blue"

>>19410093

It's not like the story isn't so well known that educated people just know it from just hearing it over and over.

and plays written about it, movies staring very famous people, and a lot of real artifacts that still exist from that period, including not just in Egypt but in Italy, and elsewhere.

>>19410093

Celopatria and Marc Anthony

played by . . .

(do I really need to name who plays the two roles?)

>>19410154

Rich played the guy

and Liz played the dame

she was a grande-dame

at the end of the movie . . . they only find

10 bodies when they thought that they were supposed to find 100 because

each of the 10

had 10 different identies, collected 10 welfare checks, and voted 10 times in the election and so . . .

that's the big reveal spoiler at the end of the mind-blowing movie . . .

that the giant conflagration didn't really kill 100 but just 10 . . .

roll credits.

>>19410178

Ah, OK.

different story.

one is def a fiction and the other was trying to portray a dramatized history.