dChan
Anonymous ID: 249052 Aug. 23, 2023, 8:04 p.m. No.19416320   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://twitter.com/LizCrokin/status/1694429398227714356

 

@LizCrokin

THE BLACK SWAN EVENT 🦢

 

Both Klaus Schwab and General Flynn have warned of a black swan event(s). Schwab has suggested this in reference to another virus outbreak. Flynn has hinted that there may be a black swan event(s) that prevents the 2024 election from happening.

 

A black swan is an unpredictable event that is beyond what is normally expected of a situation and has potentially severe consequences. Black swan events are characterized by their extreme rarity, severe impact and the widespread insistence they were obvious in hindsight.

 

The cabal is already gearing up for the next pandemic and mask mandates have already been reinstated in certain places across the country. They already have their Hollywood assets pushing for the return of masks with creepy Jamie Lee Curtis leading the charge. Make no mistake, they will try to lock down the country and the world again, mixed in with other false flags, to disrupt the election and push their NWO agenda. I believe this is part of at least one of their black swan events, and I’m confident they will fail.

 

Meanwhile, President Trump posted today on Truth Social that American Patriots will be able to show in court for the first time in three years that the 2020 election was rigged and stolen and insists we cannot let it happen again. Also, Flynn posted a week ago that the Justices of the US Supreme Court must step in before things get out of control and that politics should be fought with fair elections. Will they or the military intervene?

 

What’s clear is that both the black and white hats have their black swan events that they’re ready to unroll. We all should expect the unexpected. Something has to give, and as rocky as it probably will get — I would not bet against the patriots. Keep the faith, stay vigilant, do not comply and remember God wins!

Anonymous ID: 249052 Aug. 23, 2023, 8:11 p.m. No.19416373   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6382 >>6409

>>19416339

>Really I would have thought Tucker would notice the first time he asked, that PDjT wouldn’t go there.

True enough.

Tucker often asks questions that are about 3 years behind the times. Like he just woke up and realized. Not sure whether he's always so naive (it's possible i guess) OR whether he tries to come from where he thinks his audience is.