https://www.ago.mo.gov/home/news/2023/08/22/attorney-general-bailey-puts-mayor-jones-on-notice-after-her-announcement-to-target-gun-rights
Attorney General Bailey Puts Mayor Jones on Notice After Her Announcement to Target Gun Rights
Del Bigtree brings receipts on Twitter suppression of "free speech" on X.
Del posts about puppies and people see the post. Posts about "god-father of vaccines" and it is suppressed.
If someone wants to "suggest" a person mask it seems to me they can be resisted effectively with this line of thought: Is the "recommender" your doctor? If not and the mask required is a medical device then they are attempting to practice medicine without a license. If the mask is simply cloth or not a medical device then they are mandating a religious display and unconstitutional. Frankly , you are not obligated to follow even "recommendations" by your doctor so I think it is always up to the individual and is unconstitutional to impose on people.
It just occurred to me that there is a profound irony in the "carbon dioxide" is bad narrative. "They" are worried about carbon dioxide everywhere except behind that mask where it can actually cause harm.
The HighWire just provided information about the dangers of high carbon dioxide related to mask use.
https://thehighwire.com/watch/
https://soviethistory.msu.edu/1947-2/cold-war/cold-war-texts/stalin-election-speech/
Stalin Election Speech
Idk. Seems like there is something to see here.
There might just be something to see from the history of a county that faced a communist takeover, as America is currently facing.
>moral for morans - you can do it if you want to, just try
Agree. I could teach a five year old that was mature enough to read for about $20-30 dollars with a single book (How to teach your child to read in 100 easy lessons) and a "dime store" tablet of paper. At the end of the 100 days the child could read at a second grade level.
Don't know if this link is good, but it seems to be the same book I used.
https://startreading.com
Quote:
"It would be wrong to think that the Second World War broke out accidentally, or as a result of blunders committed by certain statesmen, although blunders were certainly committed. As a matter of fact, the war broke out as the inevitable result of the development of world economic and political forces on the basis of present-day monopolistic capitalism. Marxists have more than once stated that the capitalist system of world economy contains the elements of a general crisis and military conflicts, that, in view of that, the development of world capitalism in our times does not proceed smoothly and evenly, but through crises and catastrophic wars. The point is that the uneven development of capitalist countries usually leads, in the course of time, to a sharp disturbance of the equilibrium within the world system of capitalism, and that group of capitalist countries regards itself as being less securely provides with raw materials and markets usually attempts to change the situation and to redistribute “spheres of influence” in its own favor — by employing armed force."
monopolistic capitalism
Rockefeller?
Gates?
Another Stalin quote:
"This does not mean, of course, that the Second World War was a copy of the first. On the contrary, the Second world differed substantially in character from the first. It must be borne in mind that before attacking the Allied countries the major fascist states — Germany, Japan and Italy — destroyed the last remnants of bourgeois-democratic liberties at home and established there a cruel terrorist regime, trampled upon the principle of the sovereignty and free development of small countries, proclaimed as their own the policy of seizing foreign territory, and shouted from the housetops that they were aiming at world domination and the spreading of the fascist regime all over the world; and by seizing Czechoslovakia and the central regions of China, the Axis Powers showed that they were ready to carry out their threat to enslave all the freedom-loving peoples."