>>19454482 LB
You rhetorically asked me:
>You think high number of views = not an asset? Are you new here? Kek
Then I merely used the exact same logic as you and asked you:
>You think high number of views necessarily in every case = an "asset"?
To which you replied:
>I never said that. Why do you project such nonsense onto me?
Do you see the problem now or are you still trying to figure out who's saying what? Kek
>You claimed I said something I didn't,
False, I asked you a rhetorical question just like you did.
If anon 'claimed' anything in the rhetorical question then so did your hypocritical ass.
You claimed I made a claim that I never made. I asked a question just like you did, but you're trying to enforce an uneven disjointed engagement by insisting that your rhetorical questions play by a different set of rules than anon.
Why is this question I asked
>You think high number of views necessarily in every case = an "asset"?
a 'claim' of what you wrote, whereas this question you asked:
>You think high number of views = not an asset? Are you new here? Kek
not a claim of what anon wrote?
Not to mention the disaster you brought forth in quoting anon to anon and claiming it was from another anon. You're a confused hypocritical loser.
Filtered.
>>19455251
THE SPAM IS ITSELF AN ATTEMPT TO CENSOR THE SPEECH OF ANONS
Imagine being this retarded
Does this?
Look at the wonka and psychiatrist pepe meme spam. That's an attempt to censor anon speech.
You panicking degenerate.
The triggered scared posters are those spamming QR to censor anon speech.
anon isn't talking about self like you narcissistic faggots.
The spam censors anons collectively, reducing notables, reducing quantity of anon posts per bread, which reduces quantity of anon posts per unit of time.
Found the pro censorship by spam shill.
It does do all of that.
It's why the spammers are spamming.
The more spam, the less anon speech can fit into each bread.
By your low IQ dumbass logic, if every bread was 750 spam posts, then because there is one post open to anons, 'iT's nOt cEnSoRsHiP'.
The whole point of the spam is to de facto censor anons, because the spammers can't shut the site down even though they want to.
The shills are losing their low IQ minds, bwahahahahabaha
Muffin