TYB
Shill seethe is off the charts now, kek
they can't censor by shutting the site down with cyber attacks, so the low IQ retards are spamming the breads as a means to de facto censor anons.
What a bunch of losers. An anonymous image board is that big a threat to their weak pathetic low energy asses.
The burden of proof is on you spamming pieces of shit to prove's posts sanction spamming.
The burden is not on the victims of your spamming to prove to your personal satisfaction lest your spamming be 'what Q wanted.'
Implementing de facto censorship by spamming the boards thereby preventing anon speech and digs per bread per unit of time, isn't going unnoticed.
"we're not censoring anon's speech, we're just exploiting the site flooding the bandwidth with spam which…..collectively decreases anon's speech. tOtALLy DiFfErEnT."
anon guesses what has the shills losing their tiny minds, just a thought, take it with a grain of salt:
The 404 images is a side effect of a new AI driven shilling detector being tested in production, which could potentially eliminate the risk of all the usual suspect 'muh'-shill patterns without the need for manual oversight from BV's.
Your PROJECTED endless seethe and PROJECTED need to try to assert control over others in your pathetic life was never going unnoticed.
Calling for the deaths of anons is proof you're losing.
Now seethe again.
>I'll ask again
You can keep trying to flip the burden of proof as many times as you want, herr goebbels, but it's still on you to prove where Q sanctioned spamming the breads.
It's not anon's obligation to prove to you anything,
>as i said
Repeating the same attempt to flip the burden of proof isn't working.
anon isn't subject to popular votes of who is or who is not correct.
anons think for themselves.
Eat it.
>you have no such right to impose YOUR censorship on anyone.
THE SPAM IS ITSELF AN ATTEMPT AT CENSORSHIP.
"accept my deceptive attempt to flip the burden of proof in my pathetic defense of spamming the breads, or, or, or, you, you have an IQ lower than 50."
Funny how the shill logic is so similar to Karl Marx's.
Game is indeed over. It was over before it began. Your seethe is just the death throes of an error in human development being corrected.
The first amendment is a law on government activity, not privately owned boards you anti-constitutional oblivious retard.
Your right to speech cannot be infringed upon by government, but this isn't a government board, as much as you filthy communists want it to be.
>your jewish
Anon has no background for you filthy degenerates to weaponize and exploit in your (((Marxist))) collectivist 'logic', that's why you seethe, it's why you can't prove, it's why you can't disprove, all you have is the same playbook the communists have been using since before you were born.
Your freedom of speech does not extend to infringing the speech of anons.
You don't have a constitutional right to free speech on PRIVATELY OWNED boards you moron. The first amendment is a limit on government.
If BO wants to delete your spam for the de facto censorship it is, then exactly zero of your rights have been violated.
You're probably not even a resident, tor faggot.
*you're, dumbass.
Tell anons you're seething, without telling anons you're seething.
Kek
https://qresear.ch/?q=Another+day+at+the+office
Look at you projecting desperation after realizing and admitting you can't refute a single word of it.
Look at you pro-censor by spam shills try to persuade anons that you're really against censorship.
Moron.
Funny how you neglect to acknowledge that positive single instance good mornings, and positive single instance god bless you's, are targeted by triggered shills trying desperately to foment negativity dialectic by spam spam spam.
And then you expect anons to believe you're not the ones seething.
Kek, QR is indeed rent free in your tiny minds. It's why you're here at all, while anons are not on your hq of www.incelShills.com/blog.
You projecting shills telling anons they're projecting, as you project your own behavior you claim to denounce, is just another pathetic iteration in a long line of shill fails.
Shill spammers spam 'morning, frenz', and you expect anons to just forget about the positive single instances of it in the mornings and believe they're all the same person?
Infiltrate harder, cringe spammer.
>I don't need to refute something that is both a God given right and enshrined in the constitution
Nobody is asking you to refute your own misunderstandings of the first amendment and how it doesn't apply to privately owned boards.
Your posts are hollow.
You're complaining about censorship while defending spam driven censorship.
Shit on chessboard then fly away.
Anons don't have any background for you losers to weaponize and circlejerk over to masquerade as substantive arguments.
You're not refuting or proving anything by ignorantly labelling anons with a background.
For all anons know, you could be of the very background you're continually denouncing, but to anons it's irrelevant.
Anons are immune from your Marxist collectivist garbage.
They're not sending their best (they are)