>>19467577 lb
19467545
anyone who uses "consensus cracking" is an OSS style shill
What consensus is there to crack?
we're free speech, free thought; that's the whole point.
FB and Twit as the ones who enforce consensus
must be another perfect cast of "By the Book" projection / Propaganda / inversion.
kekkkkkke
that the stroopidist shill ploy there is; right up there with ; "Filter me, cause otherwise I get ten cents for every post"
kekkkkekkkkkekkkkkk
>>19465742 pb
>>19465897 pb
>>19465901 pb
Just to mention; of interest?
The Man who wrote the book on "Psychology and World Order" in '41 , which had the section on the Hague Court (where creepy "Jack Smith" comes from) - very interesting section, unpacked a few ideas
No way to check judges if they do wrong
Just tell them to do right and they will.
"Equity" law doesn't have to obey president, tradition or legal written law, It 's what the Judge thinks is best "for the common good" and what is "fair"
Now we know what our opposition, the crazy democrat party as it stands today (full of people with uncontrolled hate for DJT - and who can't give a reason for that sentiment that isn't fantastical)
The gentleman alleged medical scientist who wrote the Book i'm referencing has a head which goes up into a point; like ancient Egyptians and a few skulls dug up and a pic of a Baron Rothschild.
>
"Equity" law doesn't have to obey precedent, tradition nor legal written law, It's what the Judge determines is best "for the common good" and for what is "fair" according to the new Judge /Actors for the World Government.
Now we know what our opposition, the crazy democrat party as it stands today thinks is "fair"
Getting rid of DJTrump on the basis of Zip, except that he's after the crooks who steal and who run the permanant Government. And who are no planning to take our rights, even more rapaciously than in the past.
Dem party full of people with uncontrolled hate for DJT - and who can't give a reason for that sentiment which isn't fantastical and over -reaching nonsense. So who do you think they will insert for Judges and Justices and Prosecutors;
This is where "Jack Smith" came from; NWO the Hague.
Notice how Ranyard West is a physician purporting to understand the "psychology" of law.. Yet when you read it, doesn't seem like he does - it's all about what will be done in the future.
His future is NOW apparently with Hague Court taking a role in overthrowing our rule of Law.
Here's that doctor lady, expert in bioweaponry giving a littl talk at a convocation of WHO
they had to regroup, since their beginning Eugenics effort was a FAIL as compared to their projections?
Wonder who sneaked out this snippit. This has been happeneing all along.
Somebody's sneaking out videos of them giving themselves away.
? How else could they be public.
Cheers to whose ever doing that.
whose so ever sneaking out these evidences is a hero.
do you think Q team could get it off of participants cell phones?
that's a perfect shot. Lady is centered perfectly,
go screw yourselves
"consensus crack" your ass
The consensus here is that you are an absolute jerk idiot shill
And are being paid.
ak. I made a mistake
Book first published 45.
Right at the end of the War.
the NWO Reich folks used the War (they engineered - which West even tacitly admits in the section on the Hague) as an motive 'Excuse' for World Law / World Government; which is what they are really after.
I wonder who Raynard experimented upon?
I probably don't even want to know right now.. I have to adapt to the level of fuckery in easy evidence.
You really think I lusting after replies for my "ten cents"
? I don't care. Take your ten cents.
That's the stupidest story I've ever heard.
It was just promulgated by the shill to cut down on people replying to them (pretty obvious why they would like free rein for their bullshit; with no one talking back)
Reply to me all you want.
I'll always have an answer because you shills are dumb shits and on the wrong side of history.
The doctor scientist shill who spoke at WHO
said this time they were going forward without a pretense.
They Don't need one.
it's mass formation / mass psychosis; in those cases the more confused is the target, the more they cling to authority and the 'crowd."
i interpret this to mean: they are entrenching on their control,, desperate attempt
they will fail."
which is what it says
kek