Anonymous ID: 66cf4d Sept. 1, 2023, 12:23 p.m. No.19473463   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3469 >>3536

From One Unapologetic Media Hoax to the Next

 

realclearpolitics.com/articles/2023/09/01/from_one_unapologetic_media_hoax_to_the_next_149704.html

Victor Davis Hanson

AP

''Joe Biden lied repeatedly when he claimed he knew nothing of his son Hunter's influence-peddling businesses.''

 

''The president further prevaricated that he had no involvement in Hunter's various shake-down schemes.''

 

''Yet, the media continued to misinform by serially ignoring these facts.''

 

Had journalists just been honest and independent, then-candidate Joe Biden might have lost a presidential debate and even the 2020 election. The public would have learned that Hunter's business associates and his laptop proved Joe was deeply involved in his son's illicit businesses.

 

Later, as the evidence from IRS whistleblowers mounted, the White House stonewalled subpoenaed efforts and sought to craft an outrageous plea deal reduction in Hunter's legal exposure.

 

Reporters ignored the Ukrainians who claimed Joe Biden himself talked to them about quid pro quo arrangements.

 

They again discounted Hunter's laptop explicitly demonstrating that Hunter was whining that he had handed over large percentages of his income to his father Joe –variously referred to as the Big Guy and a "ten percent" recipient on many deals.

 

They played dumb about Joe Biden's use of pseudonyms and alias email accounts to hide thousands of his communications to Hunter and associates.

 

They attacked the former Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin, who now claims Biden was likely bribed by Ukrainians.

 

Yet the media can no longer hide the reality that the president of the United States likely took bribes to influence or alter U.S. policy to suit his payers. Those two crimes bribery and treason are specifically delineated in the Constitution as impeachable offenses.

 

In denial, the media has instead pivoted with hysterical glee over various weaponized prosecutions of former President Donald Trump.

 

But now, to use a progressive catchphrase, the proverbial "walls are closing in" on Joe Biden.

 

So will we at last expect the media to confront the truth?

 

Answer only if Joe Biden's cognitive and physical health continues to deteriorate geometrically to the point that he can no longer finish his term or run for reelection and thus becomes expendable.

 

Such a cynical view of the media is justified given their record of both incompetence and unapologetic deceit.

 

From 2015 to 2019, we were suffocated 24/7 with lies like "Russian collusion," "Putin's puppet," "election rigging" and the "Steele dossier."

 

When all such "evidence" was proven to be a complete fraud cooked up through Hillary Clinton's stealthy hiring of and collusion with a discredited ex-British spy, a Russian fabulist at the Brookings Institution, and a Clinton toady in Moscow, did the media apologize for their untruth?

 

Was there any media confessional that perhaps Robert Mueller and his leftwing legal team (the giddy media-dubbed "all-stars," "dream team," and "hunter-killers") proved a colossal waste of time?

 

Not at all.

 

1/2

Anonymous ID: 66cf4d Sept. 1, 2023, 12:25 p.m. No.19473469   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3536

>>19473463

 

Instead, the media went next right on to "the phone call" and "impeachment."

 

The country then wasted another year.

 

The same biased reporters now claimed that the heroic Alexander Vindman had caught Trump fabricating lies about the Bidens given Joe Biden was a possible 2020 opponent to force Ukraine to investigate them or lose American foreign aid.

 

On that accusation, Trump was impeached.

 

Then the truth emerged that, unlike Joe Biden, Trump never threatened to cancel aid, but merely to delay it.

 

Trump was right that the Bidens were knee-deep in Ukrainian bribes and influence peddling.

 

And that the whistleblower had no first-hand knowledge of the Trump call but was spoon-fed a script cooked up by the gadfly Vindman and California Rep. Adam Schiff.

 

The result was journalistic glee that we impeached a president for crimes that he did not commit but exempted another president, Biden, who had likely committed them.

 

Then came the next hoax of the Russian fabricated facsimile of Hunter's laptop.

 

The 2020 Biden campaign along with an ex-CIA head rounded up "51 intelligence authorities" to mislead the country into believing that Russian gremlins in the Kremlin had fabricated a fake laptop.

 

Ponder that absurd fantasy: Moscow supposedly had created fake nude pictures, fake photos of Hunter's drug use, and fake email and text messages from Hunter to the other Bidens.

 

The media preposterously convinced the country that the Russians and by extension, Trump had once again sandbagged the Biden campaign.

 

No apologies followed when the FBI later admitted it had kept the laptop under wraps for more than a year, knew it was authentic, and yet said nothing as the media and former spooks misled the country and warped an election.

 

Now we are enmeshed in at least four court trials on cooked-up charges that could as easily apply to a host of Democrats as to Trump.

 

For the last eight years, discredited media has never expressed remorse for any of the damage they did to the country. And they will not again when their latest mythological indictments are eventually exposed.

 

(C)2023 Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

 

Victor Davis Hanson is the Martin and Illie Anderson Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution and the author, most recently, of The Case for Trump. You can reach him by emailing author@victorhanson.com.

 

2/2

Anonymous ID: 66cf4d Sept. 1, 2023, 12:32 p.m. No.19473496   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3501 >>3502

'' The military is running a contest for ideas about improving recruitment ''

 

–americanthinker.com/blog/2023/09/the_military_is_running_a_contest_for_ideas_about_improving_recruitment.html-

September 1, 2023

 

By Andrea Widburg

If you act quickly, you can enter the joint Modern War Institute and US Army Training and Doctrine Command writing contest. The contest wants ideas to solve the military’s recruiting problems. If you can offer a winning solution in no more than 1,500 words, along with abiding with other stylistic guidelines, you’ll get public recognition, and maybe the powers that be will act on what you have to say. The deadline for submissions is at 11:50 p.m. Eastern Time, on September 3.

 

In a post announcing the contest, the Modern War Institute, which operates at West Point, explains the problem:

 

“Credible defense begins with our ability to steadily attract and retain the men and women who would assume the initial burden of a fast-breaking war.” More than forty years ago, Vice Admiral Robert B. Pirie, Jr. eloquently described why recruiting was a national security issue.

 

This year, the Army will again fail to meet recruiting goals after falling fifteen thousand short last year. Likewise, the Navy anticipates falling six thousand sailors short of its target. The Air Force has issues too, with Secretary Frank Kendall acknowledging in March that his service would fall 10 percent short this year. Except for the two smallest services—the Marine Corps and Space Force—the United States armed forces continue to face recruiting woes.

 

Do you find it as distressing as I do that the brightest minds within the military can’t seem to figure this one out on their own? It seems to me that the solutions are obvious:

 

Image: Naval Weapons Station Yorktown celebrates Pride Month. Twitter screen grab (and public domain).

 

  1. Get rid of social justice concerns about race. Our military works superbly when it’s a colorblind institution in which everyone bleeds red, white, and blue. And because it’s a life-or-death institution by its very nature, merit must be the primary focus for responsibility and advancement. Nobody wants to enlist in the military (or encourage a child to enlist) knowing that merit is a low-level consideration. That kind of thinking kills people.

Anonymous ID: 66cf4d Sept. 1, 2023, 12:32 p.m. No.19473501   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19473496

 

  1. Go back to “don’t ask, don’t tell,” which was a reasonable compromise. Those people most likely to go into the military are straight males. More than that, they’re straight Christian males. They have no interest in serving in an institution that makes a fetish of homosexuality. After all, being honest means acknowledging that homosexuality makes straight men uncomfortable. The focus on homosexuality also challenges core religious beliefs. After all, the Bible’s first chapter has God create a gender binary of complementary sexes, and the Bible’s moral teachings are about the male-female nuclear family. Offend those teachings, and you offend those potential enlistees. I’m also willing to bet that homosexual relationships (the loving and the fighting) are damaging to unit cohesion.

 

  1. Get rid of “transgenderism” in the military. Either so-called transgender people are mentally ill with a form of body dysphoria, which means they have no place in the military, or they are sexually perverse autogynephiles who are sexually aroused by their own presentation as someone of the opposite sex, which means that they have even less place in the military. Get rid of the crazy and creepy people, and you’ll get lots more normal people knocking on the door.

 

  1. Remove climate change as a military consideration. The military’s job is not to defend against climate change. It’s to defend America by defeating foreign enemies. Our troops and the American people deserve the best weapons and transportation systems regardless of their effect on the climate. I’d say that even if I gave the slightest credence to climate change madness. I definitely say it given that the whole anthropogenic climate change theory is hogwash, intended to destroy Western economic dominance and transfer wealth and military power to the third world and China. No sane person should enlist in a military that’s essentially fighting human existence.

 

  1. Get women out of combat units. Women have fought in combat units over the millennia, but they’ve done so only when the war has landed on their doorstep, creating a “fight or die” situation. Otherwise, women, who are physically weaker, have no business in a combat unit. More than that, at the most fundamental level, women should be life-givers, not life-takers. The men in a mixed-sex unit instinctively understand that, and it impairs their fighting efficiency if they’re trying to defend their female comrades rather than focus on destroying the enemy. I also suspect that heterosexual relationships damage unit cohesion.

 

  1. Every person in the military needs to be reminded daily that the military does not exist to make people feel good about themselves. It exists to defend America. Anything that weakens that primary function (race over merit, efforts at impossible-to-achieve gender parity, sexual obsessions, climate change nonsense) means that the military is failing in its duty. Those in the Pentagon who back this failure should be summarily discharged, and some should be court-martialed.

 

One more thing, although it’s not something the military can do: If the American people would get rid of presidents and Deep Staters who believe that the military’s job is to protect other countries rather than America (that is, abandon the Wilson Doctrine), that would go a long way to making the military a more enticing institution.

 

Fundamentally, if the military is returned to a sensible organization that focuses on keeping its troops alive and making its enemies dead, recruitment should be fine.

 

2/2

Anonymous ID: 66cf4d Sept. 1, 2023, 12:40 p.m. No.19473536   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19473463

>From One Unapologetic Media Hoax to the Next

 

>realclearpolitics.com/articles/2023/09/01/from_one_unapologetic_media_hoax_to_the_next_149704.html

 

>Victor Davis Hanson

>>19473469

>From One Unapologetic Media Hoax to the Next

 

>realclearpolitics.com/articles/2023/09/01/from_one_unapologetic_media_hoax_to_the_next_149704.html

 

>Victor Davis Hanson

 

additional citation

https://townhall.com/columnists/victordavishanson/2023/09/01/column-n2627841

Anonymous ID: 66cf4d Sept. 1, 2023, 12:49 p.m. No.19473580   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3772 >>3905 >>4017 >>4071

One way you can help President Trump is by sharing his policies. His policy platform is called AGENDA 47!

 

He has recorded policy videos for each of his policies. You can watch and share all of those policy videos here! Download them and share them on your social media!

 

https://donaldjtrump.com/AGENDA47

·

https://twitter.com/LauraLoomer/status/1697625437772366237

Anonymous ID: 66cf4d Sept. 1, 2023, 12:51 p.m. No.19473590   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3591

So now that I have full Subpoena Power because of the Freedom of Speech Sham Indictment by Crooked Joe Biden, Deranged Jack Smith, and the DOJ, it has just been reported that the Unselect January 6th Committee of Political Hacks and Thugs has illegally destroyed their Records and Documents…

Anonymous ID: 66cf4d Sept. 1, 2023, 12:57 p.m. No.19473615   🗄️.is 🔗kun

''Issues | Donald J. Trump''

donaldjtrump.com/issues

Issues

BIG IDEAS, BOLD AMBITIONS AND DARING DREAMS FOR AMERICA'S FUTURE

 

Rebuild the Greatest Economy in History

Read More >

 

Fair Trade for the American Worker

Read More >

 

Unleash Energy Dominance

Read More >

 

Secure Borders and Reclaim National Sovereignty

Read More >

 

War on the Drug Cartels

Read More >

 

Stop Crime and Restore Safety

Read More >

 

Renew American Strength and Leadership

Read More >

 

Reject Globalism and Embrace Patriotism

Read More >

 

Care For Our Veterans

Read More >

 

Protect Parents’ Rights

Read More >

 

Defend Law and Liberty

Read More >

 

End Censorship and Reclaim Free Speech

Read More >

 

Free, Honest and Lawful Elections

Read More >

 

Drain the Swamp of Washington Corruption

Read More >

 

Better Health Care Choices at Lower Costs

Read More >

Anonymous ID: 66cf4d Sept. 1, 2023, 1:12 p.m. No.19473682   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3688

https://youtu.be/CEMrAH68gvI

 

Sep 1, 2023 #obama #politics #biden

As Barack Obama promises to help Biden win reelection in 2024, is the former President the perfect example of how the political system exists to enrich its participants, with their true motives being revealed once they leave office?