Anonymous ID: 29c710 Sept. 2, 2023, 7:45 a.m. No.19477472   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7487 >>7621 >>7657 >>7712

Google Introduces SynthID to Combat Misinformation with AI Watermarking Technology

 

ByCandice Clark

31 AUGUST 2023

Google has introduced a new tool called SynthID that aims to prevent the spread of misinformation by embedding an invisible, permanent watermark on computer-generated images. SynthID, developed by Google’s DeepMind unit in collaboration with Google Cloud, utilizes the latest text-to-image generator called Imagen. The AI-generated watermark remains intact even if the image is modified with filters or altered colors.

 

The tool also has the ability to scan incoming images and determine the likelihood that they were created by Imagen. It uses three levels of certainty: detected, not detected, and possibly detected. While not perfect, internal testing has shown that SynthID is accurate against many common image manipulations.

 

A beta version of SynthID is currently available for select customers of Vertex AI, Google’s platform for generative AI development. Google intends to refine and expand SynthID, potentially integrating it into other Google products or even offering it to third parties.

 

Deepfake and edited images have become increasingly realistic, raising concerns about the authenticity of visual content. Tech companies, including Google, are actively seeking reliable methods to identify and flag manipulated content. The European Commission has called for technology implementation and clear labeling of such content to users.

 

In this effort, Google joins other startups and major tech companies working towards finding solutions. Companies such as Truepic and Reality Defender are part of this growing wave, recognizing the importance of protecting the distinction between reality and fabrication.

 

Google has taken its own approach to combating misinformationby creating tools like About this image, which allows users to trace the origin of images found on the site. Additionally, AI-generated images created by Google carry a markup in the original file to provide context if the image is found on another platform.

 

While these technical solutions are intended to address the problem of misinformation, the rapid development of AI technology poses challenges for human oversight. OpenAI, the organization behind Dall-E and ChatGPT, has acknowledged the imperfections of its own detection efforts in the realm of AI-generated writing. Caution is advised in relying solely on technical solutions to combat misinformation.

 

(I’m sure no person would understand if that was an AI generated picture above., kek) But Is all of this being done to label true pictures of famous people doing evil things as AIi? Like Adam Schiff is worried about!)

 

https://fagenwasanni.com/news/google-introduces-synthid-to-combat-misinformation-with-ai-watermarking-technology/249671/

Anonymous ID: 29c710 Sept. 2, 2023, 9:06 a.m. No.19477809   🗄️.is 🔗kun

The Daily Beast Suggests Trump Interview Was Fake. There's Just One Problem…Paula Bolyard

It’s a perfect example of the state of modern journalism. A “National Politics Reporter” for The Daily Beast set out to dunk on an interview John Solomon did with former President Donald Trump at Real America’s Voice, suggesting the voice on the phone was either an impersonator or AI, and ended up getting punked himself.

 

“Journalist” Zachary Petrizzo wrote an article published at The Daily Beast on Friday with the headline “MAGA Network Investigating Whether Hosts Were Duped by Fake Trump.” The subhead, which included the tagline “Major Oversight,” went on to claim, “While the owner of Real America’s Voice believes an impersonator fooled the channel, pro-Trump journalist John Solomon insists that it was ‘definitely’ Trump on the line.”

 

The opening paragraphs of the article, in addition to disparaging the channel and Solomon, claim that they were “fooled” by a trump impersonator: The owner of fringe-right channel Real America’s Voice is investigating whether pro-Trump journalist John Solomon and his co-host Amanda Head were fooled on Thursday night by a prank caller purporting to be former President Donald Trump.

 

From Article: “Solomon, a former Fox News contributor boasted on Thursday night that thelittle-watched networkhad scored an “exclusive” phone interview with Trump. However, immediately after the conversation began, it was clear that something wasn’t right.”

 

Petrizzo claimed, “The caller’s voice sounded choppy, stilted and artificial, and at times throughout thenearly 17-minute interview, the so-called Trump appeared to glitch and cut out. After clips of the interview were shared on social media by Solomon and Real America’s Voice, criticism and speculation began pouring in— including from many prominent conservatives—that this was definitely not the ex-president and appeared to be an AI program.”

 

Petrizzo’s article continued:

“Robert J. Sigg, the owner of the network, told The Daily Beast on Thursday night that the “Trump” on the call sounded “like ChatGOP” to him and that “an internal investigation will be needed” into whether his hosts were duped. “This is not the company values that the American people tune in for,” Sigg added. “This is a major oversight by John and Amanda both…”

 

Only that’s not what happened—and this is where the story gets really bizarre. It turns out that Petrizzo was duped by text messages that were not actually from Sigg. The Daily Beast has since made significant changes to the article, including this note at the top of the story:

 

Editor’s Note: This story has been updated to remove quotes attributed to the owner of Real America’s Voice, Robert Sigg, saying he is investigating whether the call was a prank and criticizing network staffers. A Daily Beast reporter had a conversation by text with a person who identified themselves as Sigg, on a number public records show was once associated with Sigg—but aspokesperson for Real America’s Voice said that it was not Sigg and is not his current number.

 

Solomon tweeted this morning: “The Daily Beast has been told by Real America’s Voice that its employees did not interview Rob Sigg, the quotes attributed to him are false and there is no investigation. How long before @thedailybeast retracts this false and defamatory story concocted from the theater of the absurd.”

 

Real America’s Voice responded to the article in a statement: Last night, President Trump was interviewed on Real America’s Voice, providing his customary insights and wisdom for our millions of viewers. Then, early this morning, The Daily Beast claimed in a published story that it wasn’t really the 45th President on the air. These are all scurrilous lies in a fake quote that The Daily Beast never received from our network. Ironically, in a story they wrote about RAV being duped, it was The Daily Beast in fact that may have been “punked” into believing they had a qualified quote from us.

 

The article was garbage to begin with and should have been retracted rather than scrubbed, but this is the kind of dishonest reporting we’ve come to expect from left-wing hacks.

 

(Slow news day! AI is the next weapon for news stories. How many other conspiracies are they going to make up?Did you ever notice the left’s CTs are revealed as fake lies quickly, and the rights gets confirmed as true all the time.The left are the real toxic “Conspiracy Theorists”!)

 

https://pjmedia.com/columns/paula-bolyard/2023/09/01/daily-beast-journalist-gets-punked-on-story-claiming-conservative-media-got-punked-by-fake-trump-n1723829#google_vignette

Anonymous ID: 29c710 Sept. 2, 2023, 9:33 a.m. No.19477912   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19477810

Agreed.

 

Anons still have and are finding massive amounts of info that is relevant today, and posts still provides new lines of research today. Everything has meaning and some have double and triple meaning.

 

I’m understanding and making more connections today along with the news that I did in the past.

 

I consider the Q posts a detailed history that has many layers that constantly prove “future proves past” to this day. It could be considered cyphers that could be used for past, current and future events and meaning.

 

If the posts have something to do with “the looking glass” then there are future events to be revealed. I see anons do this decoding all the time. And it makes the posts as or much more valuable then what was decoded then. The connections never seem to stop.

 

The posts combined are a mystery document that will always be relevant, and revelatory.

 

The only ones that failed, or failed to understand that, are the shills or anons brain that post this bullshit.

 

If there is only one benefit (which there are multiple benefits) to the world today, it is the WW Great Awakening of anons and normies at that time and that is still occurring today.

 

PS: I read an article a couple of weeks back that with all the indictments on Trump, more and more people are waking up to how they were duped about Trump and they are researching the Q posts today. So millions more new eyes on them.

 

The posts will always be relevant! And a success

 

Q insinuated it himself, never had the team connected with so many people WW and they started in the 60s with their vow. This is notable that it came out from Tucker on National TV with guests, a secret CIA source and RFKjr that JFK was definitely killed by the CIA and our gov. That story was consigned to private boards and CTs since the 60s, the public opinion was squashed since that time by CT label, and now the whole world knows and most believe it.