i'm not from the US of A (and i don't live there either) but what exactly is wrong with the death tax idea? (i mean, obviously it should only apply if you own at least a couple of million, but other than that?)

>>19484870

so you're ok with "old money" ?

>>19484889

well, if i would make the law then first of all it would only apply to people with i dunno 20+ million $ or something and secondly you could get around it by having a will and decide for yourself how that money will be spent instead of the government deciding it for you

no, i want people to earn what they have.

>>19484975

meant for >>19484966

>>19484994

i agree, but their kids didn't earn it so they shouldn't get to keep it, at least not enough to never have to work in their life, it's insane

>>19485010

i don't get what that means, like i said not a native speaker and i don't live in an english speaking country

i get that it's supposed to be an insult of some kind but not how it is

>>19484887

this was a better answer, sorry for not noticing it

i agree with what you're saying here, but then i still think a death tax is a good idea, just that it should only be applied if you own a LOT like say that you can leave your kids 20 million $ EACH (i still think this is too much but meh)

>>19485074

honestly i think there are too many laws already, there should only be ONE law, "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" (or however it's phrased) and then a jury of their peers to decide if that law was followed or not