for that one I'll need an 'off' button.
end satire
the ADL profits off of the narrative of 'bigotry against ours', so much so that they slander anyone who dares to discuss real issues concerning events of world significance if it involves those who they consider possible donors.
and also this slandering of any discussion of an important nation and it's powerful people is called bigotry, even when it isn't which . . .
which compels many to then give the ADL the narrative worse, buying into the bigotry as a way to shock (even if they know it's not true, and are just trying to be hyperbolic and obviously ironic.).
the constant accusations, slanderous accusations, of bigotry against anyone who dares to discuss the group or groups in questions fans the flames of that bigotry!
and thus the ADL is then a cause of the escalation of that bigotry!
ironic. The say they want to end that kind of bigotry but, instead, the result is an increase in it.
and thus the ADL fails their mission.
prudent people who support that group, what they imagine it should be, should demand that the group reform and refrain from their constant slandering and call to stiffle any discussion of the causes and groups considered important by those groups.
defund them.
ban them? no. They have a right to be jackasses.
but why do people still fund them?