It´s that time you IP hop, isn´t it. Go away, shill idiot.
You´re the echo chamber shill and namefagger. You´re so obvious it´s kinda embarrassing.
he´s not anon, he´s shill
I was talking about the shill, you idiot
If you can´t tell a shills from anons, go back to school
This is good for normies
Jordan Peterson: The radical Left is guilt-tripping the West into oblivion
why? who cares? why don´t you ask somewhere where historians chat?
go wikipedia then, it´s okay for conventional history lessons.
or do you have a theory or something? why the interest in him?
are you trying to talk shit about a learned people, which you claim I am, although I didn´t? that´s kinda weird.
Interesting. I don´t know anything about him reallly, but into history still.
Why doesn´t it add up?
>Why do you keep posting that meme
…because I have limited interest in talking to you. If you´re not a shill you´re barking up the wrong tree.
no comprendo
>Yet ANOTHER common shill pattern
kek
is that a pattern?
to not really want to talk to you?
kek
kys
I´ve heard similar things about Attilla and the Huns, i.e. caucasian, but no sauce.
are you "seething" yet?
I don´t know, but it´s an interesting theory. Not sure DS existed back than but the chinese did.
History is full of memory holes. Check out some interviews on yt with Ralph Ellis talking about the origin of the Hebrews in ancient Israel. His theory is that the whole 1st temple period in Ancient-Israel didn´t happen there, but in Egypt.
Now that´s a memory hole theory! …and he´s probably right, has strong arguements.
This whole chapter of history is pretty much unknown to me, but you got me interested.
I agree up to a point, but in these ancient times the continents didn´t have that much contact, and sometimes also seperated by many centuries.
I´ve mostly studied the ancient times of the Near-East, Egypt, Sumer, etc. and also my own research.
You can´t study everything. Pick the stuff that interest you, but the big picture is always good too.
I can´t read that without hearing the voice of Q+ at some rally.
yes, the post count is an indicator, but ony that.
that´s a really good one
My interest in history starts earlier, and goes back to atlantis stuff and such. Not much contact way back then, me thinks, but later on much more. I dont know that history that well, I´m too ancient.
The location isn´t really an issue for me, or other descriptions of it. The main question is whether some super-ancient civilisation existed at all.
Look into Graham Hancock. I don´t like listening to him for too long, actually, but he´s right on the money with this. He recently made "Ancient Apocalypse" on Netflix. It´s a good place to start, but much more out there.
2 basic facts to consider:
1: The myth of Atantis comes only one sauce, Plato in Ancient-Greece, says he got it from his forefather, Solon, who went to Egypt around 600 BC and got the tale from old wise men there. Most importanty he dates it. According to the tale it happened 9000 years before Solon´s time, so around 9.600 BC.
-
Ask any scientist what happened around 9.600 BC. The last ice-age ended and sealevels rose 120 meters.
Do you believe in coincidences?
I think the proof is right there. What are the chances this is just a fluke? Atlantis drowned in the sea at the same time we know sea level rose 120 meters.
This guy has a bunch of stuff about blue eyes and such..
https://www.youtube.com/@818encino/search?query=blue
Didn´t the Dannan people get there from Ancient-Egypt.
At least the Scota (as in Scotland) is said to come from there, according to Ralph Ellis and others.