i am predicting right now that NKorea and SKorea will unify in max. 4 years!

>>19488387 tyb and may God bless you

i have a question: what do anons think about Genghis Khan? (apart from what is being said and 'officially' known)

>>19488666

checkt

i knew this would be one of the answers

but, honestly, i'm asking

>>19488672

errr…because i'm asking anons specifically

and some here are best historians ever

thanks for your effort in replying, little faggot

>>19488674

have some sauce?

>>19488692

because he's been described as a mass murder conquerer everywhere and all throughout

but somehow this just doesn't add up

>>19488747

because the lots of countries and some founded by his descendants praise him until today

why would somebody praise a mass murder conquerer?

For example in Asana the statue of his successors Kerey and Zhanibek Kahn monument was errected in 2010

and if you go whereever over there somewhere people identifiy with his heritage

and not in a bad way

>>19488761

i heard that too, but also found some articles that say it's just a claim since there is no DNA proof done (officially)

>>19488810

and the Chinese money is still called Yuan

i think that is very much interesting

>>19488819

what if Temüjin (G.Khan) actually faught some sort of deep state and was about uniting all tribes against this DS?

maybe i'm wrong but what if it's somehow right and historians/scribes wrote what they wrote and memoryholed this and that …

>>19488839 me

didn't want to slide

it's just so strange

and since many things history teaches are wrong it could be with what they say about this guy the same …

anyways thank you for your thoughts, anons

>>19488866

>Not sure DS existed back than but the chinese did

nobody liked the ancient Chinese dynasties back then, they were cruel

and on the western side there were lots of kalifats, and the muslims wanted to rule the world the same way the Han and the rest of the gang wanted to rule the world… and they definitely raped women and all surrounding countries had to give women and children as tributes to the Chinese emperors

>>19488888

>>19488916

it was for me too

but then i thought, if one really wants to understand the shit that's going on right now, one needs to see the whole worldwide picture ww present and past as well

i mean: it's all connected, you have always had trade routes, trade stuff, trade monopolies etc (gold, silk, salt, weapons, astronomy, calendars, almanachs, technology, innovations etc) it's all connected.

so it doesn't make sense to study just one part of the world but to have a closer look at everything that happened all around the world at certain times.

>>19488966

>continents didn´t have that much contact

sure they had

it was 1000 years ago only (G.Khan)

or like for example Jang Bogo used sailing technology from arabs 1200 years ago to establish a trade route with China and Japan from the South of South Korea

ffs

people from Europe were trading with the Chinese Empire and even with smaller kingdoms like Silla etc.

even India and ancien Korea were connected 2000 years ago

all were connected

as i told you they exchange so much tech and innovations, books, rare goods, this and that

you had translators speeking several languages even from rare tribes somewhere

>>19489036

>Atlantis

cool. exciting topic!

so was it in Greece?

or Canary Islands?

or what do you think?

>>19489069

>basic facts

anons know about that

>>19489111

kek