come on up to the house…
Hu!
Who!
Who?!
come on up to the house…
Hu!
Who!
Who?!
60
Nov 02, 2017 7:03:36 PM EDT
Anonymous ID: WBXFv1gI No. 147679416
You can count the people who have the full picture on two hands.
Of those(LESS THAN 10 people)only three are non-military.
Why is this relevant?
Game theory.
Outside of a potential operator who has been dialed-in w/ orders (specific to his/her mission) nobody else has this information.
Operators never divulge.
Alice & Wonderland.
244
Dec 01, 2017 12:38:08 AM EST
Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: fbc52d No. 17474
LESS THAN 10 can confirm me.
DOITQ - coincidence
Twitter retweet - coincidence
Twitter keywords - coincidence
Pics - coincidence
Meant only for you.
God bless.
Q
722
Feb 11, 2018 2:47:56 PM EST
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 5bc869 No. 339123
Think BDT NYC ‘attempt’ & Barlow.
Not stated for verification of credibility.
Why are we still here given foreknowledge of events?
No FBI investigation into this?
Impossible to locate?
LESS THAN 10.
Who are we talking to?
Since Clown takedown of black_ops loc/public exposure what has changed here?
Expand your thinking.
This is not a game.
RED_OCTOBER.
Q
1788
Aug 01, 2018 2:06:23 PM EDT
Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 5cec6e No. 2393006
Aug 01, 2018 1:57:39 PM EDT
Anonymous ID: b56ba3 No. 2392766
FINALLY SOMEONE ASKED ABOUT Q!!!!!!!!!!!!
Who is the one person who can answer?
POTUS.
[LESS THAN 10].
Q
2468
Nov 10, 2018 12:44:56 PM EST
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 000000 No. 443
The 'Scaramucci' Play
Temp hire to remove embedded 'untrustworthy' staffers?
>Spicer
>Priebus
Temps can be very dangerous to those who are targeted.
Think Whitaker.
[NEXT WEEK]
WH [optics] must remain stable.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/list-officials-left-trump-administration/story?id=49334453
[Many] did not leave by choice.
[Save-Face] and promote MAGA or [be exposed].
LESS THAN 10.
Attacks occur from all directions.
Logical thinking.
Why attack a movement simply, by design, asking people to think for themselves?
CONTROL = POWER
Why are the biggest news co's in the world continuing to attack this movement?
WHY IS THE WASH POST LEADING THE ATTACKS?
WHY DO THE ATTACKS COME IN WAVES?
COORDINATED?
YOU ATTACK THOSE THE MOST WHO ARE THE BIGGEST THREAT.
[SWAMP] contains RED & BLUE.
Q
3306
Mar 29, 2019 5:23:25 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: f29653 No. 5966972
Mar 29, 2019 5:04:14 PM EDT
Anonymous ID: c53abd No. 5966583
Mar 29, 2019 4:58:21 PM EDT
Anonymous ID: 76aef5 No. 5966470
ATTN PRESS / MSM
When you see something that’s outrageous: before latching onto it you must first understand this is open to anyone. Posts are made to try and attribute the most outlandish and unrelated things to our work … intended to support the narrative that we are loons and discourage others from joining us. Use this tool to help spot this deception:
http://qresear.ch and type the exact text of a given subject and you will see it posted thousands of times. We aren’t idiots and don’t repeat a topic 24x7.
They don’t contribute to any active discussion, regardless of the gravity of the news. They also have much higher post counts, usually over 15. This is viewed as disrespectful to other anons, as there are limits on each thread to the number of replies.
Thus these ruses are easy to spot.
The most common are hateful towards a given group or what we call “slides” where it’s intended to distract from major news. These are entirely planted, and users are paid to do so. This board is not much different from any comment section on a site, and yes they get paid to “shape” opinion there too. The notion we can prevent something like this, when anyone can post anonymously, is a huge leap. We are busy with current events and research and filter them or ignore it. This isn’t one of your safe spaces, so if you can’t discern the difference, you shouldn’t be here.
Thanks For Playing, Come Again
TOGETHER WE ARE STRONG
DIVIDED WE ARE WEAK
WWG1WGA
>>5966470
yes, agree.
See the posts made here in the context of ALL Q DROPS made.
This makes shills visible.
(shills attacking this post are butthurt much, very effective post, anon!)
>>5966583
Attacks increasing?
Context of drops mislabeled and used?
Select orgs/journalists dropping controversial info as attempt to label as whole, screenshooting, then writing articles on drops they themselves wrote?
Highlight of corrupt PAC = deflect by PAC = point to former members as method to shield?
We are being bombarded for a reason.
Look for keywords to be repeated by many (controller & coordinated roll out).
FAKE NEWS IN FULL PANIC.
(LESS THAN 10).
Q
3307
Mar 29, 2019 5:25:10 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: f29653 No. 5967016
Mar 29, 2019 5:23:25 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: f29653 No. 5966972
Mar 29, 2019 5:04:14 PM EDT
Anonymous ID: c53abd No. 5966583
>>5966470
yes, agree.
See the posts made here in the context of ALL Q DROPS made.
This makes shills visible.
(shills attacking this post are butthurt much, very effective post, anon!)
>>5966583
Attacks increasing?
Context of drops mislabeled and used?
Select orgs/journalists dropping controversial info as attempt to label as whole, screenshooting, then writing articles on drops they themselves wrote?
Highlight of corrupt PAC = deflect by PAC = point to former members as method to shield?
We are being bombarded for a reason.
Look for keywords to be repeated by many (controller & coordinated roll out).
FAKE NEWS IN FULL PANIC.
(LESS THAN 10).
Q
>>5966972
When they can’t attack the information provided, they attack the messenger.
Define ‘deflection’.
Logical thinking.
Shill count HIGH.
Q