Anonymous ID: d29c2d Sept. 5, 2023, 9:36 a.m. No.19494770   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4796

>>19494721

Donald Trump is the reason 'two tier system of justice' is even in the vernacular now such that you use it uncontroversially, homeslice.

Tell DeSanctimonious his campaign is over.

Anonymous ID: d29c2d Sept. 5, 2023, 9:48 a.m. No.19494815   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4822 >>4826 >>4848 >>4854

>>19494802

So you're not only an incel neckbeard virgin, you're also cognitively impaired.

How in the world can an ANON be courting anyone's attention such that they will know who it even is to engage in what you're imagining about MTG unsolicited?

 

>>19494784

Says the projection shill, triggered over MTG, livin' rent free, kek.

Anonymous ID: d29c2d Sept. 5, 2023, 9:54 a.m. No.19494835   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4854 >>4865 >>4871

>>19494822

They're different posts.

Claiming multiple tags in the same post makes anon a 'shill', is itself a claim of a shill.

>especially when you weren't involved in the referenced posts to begin with.

You replied to this:

>>19494764

You didn't post that, you replied to it, as did anon to yours.

You don't create any circles here like in a schoolyard, jasper.

Anonymous ID: d29c2d Sept. 5, 2023, 9:59 a.m. No.19494862   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4893

>>19494848

>Who is courting attention?

You claimed I was, with this

>Keep dreaming anon, she's not gonna fuck you.

 

>that they will know who it even is

>MTG? You are aware that she's fairly well known right?

No, anon, numbnuts. As if MTG would even know who anon is

>to engage in what you're imagining about MTG unsolicited?

>It wasn't unsolicited, it was a direct reply.

What you're imagining about anon was what was referred to as unsolicited.

 

>Sounding smart and being smart is two completely different things.

Kek

Anonymous ID: d29c2d Sept. 5, 2023, 10:09 a.m. No.19494904   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4962

>>19494887

Yeah found that out after I posted. I was going to tag your other post but was already close to the same one as before because that's closer to the other anon's post, so tagged the same one again as a reply to that other post you made when you called anon a 'projection shill'. So yeah, anon tagged the wrong post, thereby double replying, my bad.