dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

Anonymous ID: 92bfcb Sept. 5, 2023, 12:39 p.m. No.19495505 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>5523 >>5578

Hypothesis: Truth Social is satire.

Little has been disclosed about the involvement of the financier,Abraham Cinta, and the Shanghai-based investment bank he leads, ARC Group Ltd, in theshell company’s regulatory filings.

ARC is listed as“financial advisor” to Digital World Acquisition Corp, the special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) that signed a deal in October to merge with Trump’s new media platform. No details are provided in the filings other than that ARC could help the SPAC with contacts in government and the business world, as well as access to a “quality deal pipeline.”

Now, new information - text messages, a financial document outlining proposed terms of the shell company, an agreement between ARC and one of Digital World’s creators, and interviews with five sources familiar with the situation - shows that Cinta and ARC did not just advise Digital World. They also offered money to create Digital World and recruited an executive to help put the company together.

ARC offered to provide at least $2 million to three businessmen to form Digital World, the SPAC that went on to merge with Trump Media and Technology Group, and Cinta had a say in how the SPAC’s management team would be compensated, according to the financial document and text messages between Cinta and others involved.”

https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-trump-socialmedia-arc-idCAKBN2KF17W

>>19495513

>>19495523

>>19495539

He's part of the show. Expand your thinking.

>>19495567

It's a psyop.

Anonymous ID: 92bfcb Sept. 5, 2023, 1:05 p.m. No.19495677 🗄️.is 🔗kun >>5750

>>19495578

Why is Satire Challenging for Modern Readers to Understand?

"As modern readers, if we have a harder time understanding satire, it is partly owing to a decline of satire itself, which thrives in environments that repress select ideas. A prevailing theme of satire is how it often expresses opinions that, if spoken plainly, would lead to consequences for the author. Whether it’s an opinion that goes against the interests of a powerful person — such as a politician — or an institution — such as the government — or even one that creates dissent among the general public, satire uses its subversive form to express an idea that isn’t otherwise easy to talk about.

…Political satire has its own reasons for decline. In 2017, Facebook introduced a satire tag on articles because there was an increasing number of people who couldn’t differentiate between headlines from The Onion and what actually constituted news. Part of the blame lies in the very engineering of social media. Since advertising is the only monetization that keeps it afloat (imagine paying for Instagram), social media does its best to keep you hooked. If you look at what this algorithm does to your news feed, you’ll see that it shows every person news articles relevant to their side of the political spectrum. This is one factor that’s led to the prevalence of fake news and polarized views. A more pressing problem, at least in the U.S., is that people are no longer agree on what is true. If you live in a political environment where there’s no majority on basic facts, understanding satire is quite a distant dream."

https://bookriot.com/satire-challenging-for-modern-readers/

>>19495691

It has also been my experience that I post something I think might be good, and then several others reply in a nanosecond calling me names or outright discrediting my post with only opinions without sauce, or using logical fallacies.