Anonymous ID: 7498fe Sept. 6, 2023, 8:56 a.m. No.19500427   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>19500417

I made a tasteless pun see:

>>19500408

I guess I for one don't really see too much shame in a woman selling her self to get ahead in the sense that she can redeem her self and make good later.

and it's supposedly a bad thing to 'shame' a woman for having to sell her body to get ahead and yet

if we dare suggest that, we're seen as worse than that person who sold themself to get ahead.

and if she did, because a lot of cultures pretend that it is OK and call it being a 'spy' or call it 'espionage' and that it's fine as long as it supports the coven/group . . .

I made a tasteless joke and no one here seems to get it

"The Madame, president"

Anonymous ID: 7498fe Sept. 6, 2023, 9:41 a.m. No.19500663   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>19500435

suffering is a fact of human existence.

the attitudes you have about other people's suffering is part of how others see you.

also the way you behave when suffering is a marker in your own adultness and growth towards understanding.

But, as salvation is not based upon knowledge, and suffering is important to gain knowledge, suffering doesn't add to your 'redemption'.

the attitudes about it are important.

to think that no suffering for anyone is possible in this world is a grand mistake.

to augment suffering to give people awareness is called by many 'abusing those people'.

to snark about it and act all high and mighty and question other people's attitudes about suffering like an inquistor, which is what you are doing ? ? ?

what do you think that makes people see in you?

why would I type out this long winded response to someone who I just causally notice badgering someone else?

why did you ask that other anon your leading question 'I take it you don't see suffering as redemptive'.

again: suffering isn't redemptive. Salvation isn't based upon knowledge.

it can lead to redemption by making people be aware of their own sinful ways so that they confess and / or convert.

but by itself? I don't think so.

Anonymous ID: 7498fe Sept. 6, 2023, 9:51 a.m. No.19500706   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0809

>>19500628

the story of the 'rebels' of that time gets very dark and the behavior of those groups got worse and worse to the point where they are said to have become fairly murderous and to go and kill everyone in a region, for example what happened (said to have happened) on Cypress in the 2nd century.

and of course that history isn't widely available.

why would you want to make heroes of people who were murderous apostates?

Anonymous ID: 7498fe Sept. 6, 2023, 9:54 a.m. No.19500722   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>0751

>>19500707

the 'biomass' is potent and ready to sprout into new forests. If these folks really believe in 'global warming' and 'climate change' why would they not bag up all of this debris from the forests and spread it on the desserts that will eventually become wet (in their view) so that when they do get wet new forests will sprout?

 

why?

It makes it seem as if their real goal is total devastation and the elimination of all sources of C02?

Anonymous ID: 7498fe Sept. 6, 2023, 10:06 a.m. No.19500767   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>19500749

Is this a picture of Lil?

and you're saying she's what?

the idea that one can not question what seems to be an infiltrated and compromised non-profit, that seems to make it's bread by fear mongering and slandering others, is the height of bigotry, no matter what you call it.

And thus your statement that one who questions it is a bigot thus defames the very people who you pretend to defend.

You fan the flames of that which you pretend to want to extinguish.

Anonymous ID: 7498fe Sept. 6, 2023, 11:21 a.m. No.19501139   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>19501061

but but but . . . don't they know he has the most expensive shirts, more expensive than those of anyone else?

Does his fashion-beast-ness no longer give him any cred? At all?

โ€“end of either sarcasm, satire, or snarky statement indicating this is for humor and not to be taken as an opinion