>>19505256
anon's meme is rent free in your mind.
You're losing it.
Kek, good.
>>19505256
anon's meme is rent free in your mind.
You're losing it.
Kek, good.
anon's meme is rent free in your head to the point you need to pretend memes are people
anon has experienced something similar, resolved the strangeness by accepting the fact that even if a person's mind was impacting by 'earworms' you had said, where perhaps they don't even remember it was you, that still at the end of the day each person owns their own mind and nothing anon said was really meant to result in any permanent 'I know this because anon told me' extrovert reward or recognition.
anons were driven by a desire for truth, unity, and the prosperity/advancement that follows for humanity.
God will always know what you did, even if the people around you don't.
Yes, this. And lots of times people won't fully accept what they already tend to believe unless they feel safe to do so, which often times comes from 'extroverts' saying out loud what was secretly believed, it then the people will also speak about it and it will look like the source was more recent than it really was.
anon meant earworms in the sense that you say something autistic, something the fake news would smear you as a conspiracy theorist, but for whatever reason it sticks in the listeners mind, they can't shake it, it stays like a splinter, after which it will eventually become 'common knowledge'.
One example is Epstein's child rape blackmail operation. When I first talked about it, it was reacted to at best neutrally, and that's being generous.
Today everyone I know knows about it and can freely speak about it.
>>19505311
anon is 100% rent free in your mind.
You're spamming the bread with anon's meme.
You're projecting your own thoughts onto anon as if anon's meme is an autobiography of anon.
You're projecting your own 'pure terror' at the reality that anons detect your posts as projections/mimicry, thereby negating your attempt to create a narrative that you're observing anything outside your own mind.
You're projecting your own narcissism by seething over baker getting thanked for taking the time and doing work to make breads and make it possible for anons and you to post anything, in your perpetual parasitic approach.
You keep projecting your own experience of anon's memes existing as rent free in your mind, by you trying to alienate that experience by pretending the anon rent free on your mind, is having you rent free in theirs, all the while you spam the breads with anon's meme.
Your posts are an experiment in what it looks like when a schizophrenic with narcissistic personality disorder victim tries to solve a problem by repeatedly implementing it.
anon knows that your logic is derived whether you realize it or not, from Marxist logic. Marx too wrote that to 'solve' the 'problem' of means of production being distributed owned by private individuals across society, is to maximize private ownership in the hands of a dictatorship, and then have faith in the mystical 'dialectic' to by itself turn the world into a communally owned utopia.
You're doing the same thing. You're identifying a 'problem' about an anon, and to 'solve' the problem you're repeatedly doing what you think is what anon is doing, maximizing it by spamming the breads with the narratives from anon livin' rent free in your mind, and you have faith in the dialectic to resolve the very 'problem' you yourself are repeatedly implementing, at the same time as you declaring it a problem.
You're engaging in the narrative equivalent of repeating a problem to solve the same problem.
In systems architecture you'd just be a bug in the code.
>>19505435
The same garbage shill class being instantiated with different variables is still the same garbage shill class.
Educate more about multiple personalities.
anon knows and can see clearly you're right.
Mika and Psycho Joe can't understand how all those hoaxes and false accusations against Q+ aren't resulting in the sheeple supporting a traitorous Potato.
>>19505543
You're implementing ADL logic.
Spam anti-jew narrative, falsely call it 'truth', then accuse baker of what you're doing.
>>19505571
Sure we can, we just focus on the loudest sources of the narrative in the first place and realize it's a psyop to divide humanity.
You, and ADL, are loud sources. Your spam extends no further than yourselves.
That third meme is directly over the target holy shit.
Shill spamming bread with stale notes.
You and your fellow triggered shills are most definitely triggered, kek.
If you were on a shill team of projection logic psyop, and you realized that your garbage code has been cracked and negated, that it is not only not stopping what's coming, but accelerating it by quickening the speed at which your garbage code is noticed in all its various iterationsโฆ.wouldn't your likely reaction look pretty much like how they're reacting now with their seethespam?
The 'higher loYalty' of a misguided faith in a godless dialectic, a ritual cult practise of invoking their own inconsistent self-contradictory information objects as somehow consistent descriptions of ontological reality.
When the ancient old guard logic doesn't work in a digital battlefield containing a relentless pursuit of consistent code, you'd react pretty much like how they're reacting right now as their op is systematically dismantled.
If the WSJ poll shows tied, it means Trump is ahead.
He ones you don't see.
>>19506060
He never said that, liar.
Liar.
anons can see the panic on q research too, kmao! They're in total meltdown mode.
https://truthsocial.com/@01010001/posts/111024284332119534
Denial ain't just a river in Egypt.