They're so fucking obvious.
>free speech is free speech
Speech designed to censor free speech is not free speech.
The posts anon is referring to are themselves designed and intended to discredit, suppress, attack, smear, ostracize, DEFAME, and ultimately silence and censor q research posts by falsely painting it as the very narrative the cult is posting.
Free speech that itself contains a logic of weaponization to silence the speech of 'opponents' of radical Marxism/Fascism is not CONSISTENT free speech, it is INCONSISTENT 'free speech' with a motivation to CENSOR speech.
It is 'free speech for me, no free speech for thee.'
anons know the game. Weaponizing speech to silence speech, under a fake banner of free speech as such.
The concept of "speech" includes text, voice, pictures, and even money donations.
>https://americasfuture.net/newsletter/grounding-a-nation-by-we-the-people/?blm_aid=34941
Look at that token.
Not disagreeing at all with deleting speech itself designed to suppress speech.
But not going to redefine speech to make the deletions consistent.
anon defines the gore and cp as speech, but speech designed to censor speech, so it is a form of inconsistent 'free speech'.
Consistency vs. Inconsistency.
It is precisely because anon has a mind and is using it that anon can detect the gore and cp speech as intended to suppress/censor speech, therefore it is INCONSISTENT FREE SPEECH.
I.e. HYPOCRISY
BOOM
What a coincidence.
anpn DOES IN FACT 'take responsibility' for EVERYTHING anon posts.
You're making false claims.
END OF ARGUMENT.
Agreed. There exists 'speech' that is a weaponization, criminal, and deserved as prosecuted, i.e. Lying to a court jury under oath to hide criminal intent. That is speech, and deservedly prosecutable.
Any other anons feel like a Rubicon was recently crossed?
Torba is a MOS/C_A asset WHOSE SOLE PURPOSE is to serve as a straw man for ADL to attack as 'anti-semitic'.
Controlled opposition designed to divide humanity, to divide Jews and Christians.
Greenblatt is merely describing the radical left marxist fascist globalist cult psyop INTENDED to enflame hatred and division.
He said "that's the real world"…no it isn't that's just the psyop intended to divide the world. THAT is the real world.
Wait, isn't the purpose of Israel 1948 to be a JEWISH NATION STATE?
If 'Christian Nationalism' is abhorrent and wrong, and deserves such a smug contorted face of disgust, why isn't Jewish Nationalism so treated for the same reason?
Either BOTH 'Christian Nationalism' AND 'Jewish Nationalism' are wrong, or neither are.
What happens when thesis AND antithesis is revealed to be sourced from the same network of infiltrators worldwide?
Optics of separating, kayfabe, means we're getting closer.
You're controlled opposition narrative.
Projection projection projection.
You're still controlled opposition, now gloating and mocking.
Except anon sees it so you just look like a fool devoted to a failing old guard.
Tick tock.
You're controlled opposition.
In 2016, but not by choice.
Nice try controlled opp.
Jesus wasn't speaking to 'the jews', he was speaking to a subset of those calling themselves Jews but are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
Jesus and His Apostle followers were all themselves Jews.
Fuck yeah Jordan Peterson
>which side
The 'side' that wants to prolong division and parasitism within humanity for its own selfish power seeking sake, at the expense of the rest of humanity. That side.
By individual names right? That's what you mean right?
KJV
Galatians 1:13-14 In-Context
11 But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man.
12 For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.
13 For ye have heard of my conversation in time past in the Jews' religion, how that beyond measure I persecuted the church of God, and wasted it:
14 And profited in the Jews' religion above many my equals in mine own nation, being more exceedingly zealous of the traditions of my fathers.
15 But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother's womb, and called me by his grace,
16 To reveal his Son in me, that I might preach him among the heathen; immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood:
-—-
"Immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood"
If anon names ONE individual who would ostensibly be part of that 'group', but was as against the NWO as anon, then that is fully sufficient to refuting your logic of collectivism that lumps ALL into one by guilt by association.
>Oh righteous unbiased one
Why do you speak like a fag with your shit all retarded? Speak like an adult not a little bitch.