>Either BOTH 'Christian Nationalism' AND 'Jewish Nationalism' are wrong, or neither are.
stupid goyim
we are God's chosen people
you will all submit
>Trump is not a doctor, the moment he would have said anything against what was recommended, "IMPEACH"
gee, what a convenient EXCUSE for not REPLACING fauci and company with "experts" who would have told the truth
>Trying to get Trump between a rock & a hard place, is going to backfire on them. I suspect.
as long as there are cognitive dissonant trumptard sycophants to defend him not matter what, SADLY you may be right
>Where in the Constitution does it say that?
where in the constitution does it say the opposite?
children are wards of their parents, until they attain the age of majority
that is UNIVERSAL law
make up your pea brain…
if children are competent to refuse a medical procedure that has proven benefits
then they are competent to consent to sex with an adult
then they are competent to consent ot gender reassignment surgery without parental knowledge
you want to have your cake and eat it, too
>The JFK assassination was a coup.
the coup happened LONG before 11/23/63
the assassination of JFK was an exclamation point
it was a declaration of, "yeah, and there's NOTHING any of you can do about it"
how conveniently you sidestepped the issue of your blatant hypocrisy
shill tactic number one
fuck your slide
fuck you
die and burn in Hell
>they call themselves….
so WHO IS this "they" that you mention?
in reality, are they predominantly one race?
in reality, are they predominantly one religion?
the purpose of deflection isn't simply to turn people against one another
the MAIN purpose is to AVOID CULPABILITY AND CONSEQUENCES
>By individual names right? That's what you mean right?
tell me, oh righteous unbiased one….
if i name 10,000 individuals who secretly run the world
and they all just "happen" to be of one race and one religion
then that's somehow magically NOT bigoted?
can't we just save time and name the group?
>"Immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood"
oh…
great….
having conversations with the voices in his head
let's all follow him, and believe everything he says
>then that is fully sufficient to refuting your logic of collectivism that lumps ALL into one by guilt by association.
there's always "one"
never heard the expression, "the exception that PROVES the rule?"
when ALL of the members of that group, collectively and publically DENOUNCE the 10,000 individuals and RENOUNCE any association with them, call us.