Playing the devil's advocate here for a moment…

Trump did accomplish many good things while Pres and I believe he will continue to do that if he is re-elected, but this did not include critical things like:

• fixing the brainwashing machine known as "fake news"

• fixing the murderous/genocidal pharma system

• overhauling the justice system

• disbanding the corrupt three letter agencies

• fixing government corruption

• justice for the bad guys

• other promises hinted at in various Q drops and Trump speeches

• and on, and on (add nauseum and hopium here)

I get that these things take time to fix, but a very reasonable question stands:

What actually will be different between Trump 2016 and Trump 2024 other than the year?

>>19516551

Not a shill. Why do some Anon's here always go straight to that as their only means to dodge a valid question. Grow up and if you are unwilling or unable to answer a query why don't you just ignore it and move on instead of labelling everyone who doesn't think exactly the way you do. ffs

>>19516568

>Trump did accomplish many good things while Pres and I believe he will continue to do that if he is re-elected

>>19516544

>>19516551

>>19516554

>>19516561

>>19516565

>>19516568

>>19516569

>>19516577

>>19516578

Ok, different approach and lesson learned. Here's the list after q quick search:

https://archive.li/https://www.whitehouse.gov/trump-administration-accomplishments/

I actually asked the question to help me have a decent discussion with another anon who I'm trying to convince that Trump will in fact do BETTER than he did before - that was my only motivation but for some reason too many people here jump on the shill bandwagon without giving a valid question the benefit of the doubt. Reword my post and every single word in it however you would like, but my question is reasonable and valid.

Maybe a good answer could have been: he chose traitors the first time to support him and now he has learned to better select his staff.

Another good answer (and thank you!)

>>19516588

>>19516615

Why does everyone who comes here need to know the answer to everything, or to have read every q post 50 times, or cannot actually be somewhere between a "normie" and a "veteran anon"?

I come here, to this research board, to do research which may include "conversing with the locals". As Trump once said "Is that such a bad thing?"

Are "normies" who come here looking for answers always treated like this? Or are they sometimes given the benefit of the doubt, treated with respect, and assisted to the best of our ability. Did you take that approach here?