>>1952073

To answer it, must know

• the definition of "we"

• arrive where?

Depending on these answers, we could have some wildly different interpretations.

>>1952138

What if it means Q+ ?

We don't actually know who or what the + is?

Although some theories have been floated

>>1952168

They want to paint us as violent extremists.

Which we are not.

>>1952250

I remember, but I'm not convinced. Might be individuals. Might be markers to associate different crumbs that were dropped at different times into logical narrative groups. Might be movie/book references that shed light the info or provide symbols. It's not my field, kek, i'm a memefag planefag.

GN anons. Tomorrow's another day.