Anonymous ID: 0c62b8 Sept. 10, 2023, 3:36 p.m. No.19526216   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6233 >>6252 >>6261 >>6309 >>6528 >>6601 >>6741 >>6768

@DJTgraphic added for keks

Another “Milktoast” lightweight commentator put on by now ratings challenged FoxNews & the Globalist dummies at The Wall Street Journal, Maura Gillespie, just said that I wasn’t working as hard on the Republican campaign trail as some of my competitors. I just returned from 2 days of massive crowds in Iowa and South Dakota. Others drew “flies.” Also, tell lightweight “Maura,” that I am leading all of these so-called “hard workers,” by more than 50 Points, and Crooked Joe by a lot - NO ENERGY!

5:45pm ET

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/111043041870451481

Anonymous ID: 0c62b8 Sept. 10, 2023, 3:41 p.m. No.19526255   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6266 >>6273

>>19526141

He's getting roasted in his comments.

Kek there was a time anons fought for Trump under his Twitter posts.

Those days are gone, Truth Soc just doesn't engage shills for the cause.

Sad to scroll DJT's comments now.

Anonymous ID: 0c62b8 Sept. 10, 2023, 3:47 p.m. No.19526286   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19526233

Yeah he did, this is the second "Milktoast"

But isn't it milquetoast?

Makes sense to anon. No more Q

But not to everyone busting his nuts.

Spelling matters, right kek milquetoast

Anonymous ID: 0c62b8 Sept. 10, 2023, 3:57 p.m. No.19526357   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19526289

>Obama would have jailed everyone

Probably. Truth is just as bad, there is either still real hatred for DJT or the shills got a pay increase. The difference is (from anons observation) is Twitter he had massive anon/patriot support fighting back in the comments. On Truth hardly any pushback on the nasty comments/memes, seems anons/patriots just drop their comment and ignore the negative. I only bring it up because some part of me thought DJT got the word or saw for himself the fight, now if he were to scan looks bad, like th enemy is winning even on his own platform. Just muh 2 cents ;)

Anonymous ID: 0c62b8 Sept. 10, 2023, 4:52 p.m. No.19526689   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19526465

>Why not follow Jack

Why is the question, I suppose because he has so much reach (followers).

Q pointed out POSO & AJ and anons have seen plenty on Jack Posobiec lying about Q