Anonymous ID: c20f9b June 29, 2018, 3:26 a.m. No.1955636   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1955613

That may reach some people but I do not think its factually accurate.

The Clinton Machine wanted to run against Low Energy Jeb.

TRUMP was someone the DNC ran against becoming the GOP nominee.

This has been their MO for decades. Still the video has value and anyone understanding the above doesn't need to be woke anyway, just constructive feedback. nice work whoever did it though.

Anonymous ID: c20f9b June 29, 2018, 3:30 a.m. No.1955645   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5656

>>1955637

Reread the Drop:

>>1952583

That is the Question, not literally who is Q but rhetorically who is Q.

 

TBO: I'm Red Pilled and Skilled. Still if POTUS got on National TV and Said Q has been working for me I still think I'd loose my lunch, even thoughโ€ฆ

 

I think it'd be awesome.

Anonymous ID: c20f9b June 29, 2018, 3:50 a.m. No.1955733   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1955656

Right not what his physical identity is, but rather what Is Q anon.

It is important to note that Q is most assuredly not "one" person but "Q+." In the early part we saw more diversity of posts. Q Also includes POTUS IMO. So technically POTUS could say that I am Q. Here are a few implications of that.

1) POTUS looses plausible deniability, which up until this point has been the MO but it seems he is ready to give that up.

2) If POTUS says "I'm Q" then everything Q said or did which could be considered a violation of the Nat Security Act would be exempt from that Statute (Since POTUS is the ultimate authority of Classified Information). By POTUS saying it is inherently declassified instantly.

Hope that helps some Anon. I'm not an expert but in lay terms I think they are correct statements.