>>19552988
Around and around and around
Fifty demerits for lack of originality
Same playbook:
Attack Jim W if and when possible, when that fails
Attack BO, when that fails
Attack BVs, when that fails
Attack Bakers, when that fails←You Are Here
Attack anons in general, when that fails
Attack specific anon, when that fails
Back to top
You failed before you clicked the Reply button
I saw the attacks on Jim last night, not sure when the cycle started for today
Then the attacks on BO and the BVs, that were answered by a "how to become a BO yourself" post of instructions
Copy pasta indeed, but accurate as the playbook is always the same
So what now, move to the attacks on specific anon, as in me? The same try to provoke an emotional response to start an argument to waste the bread.
Same shit, over and over
What fail
I post it to remind the shills of how their playbook has been known for years
>>19553234