You really don't realize this is all a show huh? Patriots in control. Actors are acting. All assets deployed.
POTUS isn't even a target.
Or you just wanted your prayer to be seen by everyone.
What part of enjoy the SHOW do you not understand? How many times does POTUS have to tell you the "news" is fake?
By the way, a particularly like you telling God in your prayer…
>The Globalists are getting increasingly dangerous, and appropriate countermeasures must be taken to mitigate the risks we face as patriots. It’s now more clear than ever we are at WAR with those who wish to do us harm.
God needs you to inform Him of current happenings? No, your prayer was to be seen by others.
Absolutely false. She's in public, she has no expectation of privacy in public. They have every right to film her and release it. They only need consent to use it commercially.
False. One or two party consent is for private conversations where there is an expectation of privacy, not public.
Why do you think paparazi film people all the time? It's freedom of press. NO State requires consent to be filmed in public. You have no expectation of privacy in public. Again, one or two party consent is for private conversations with an expectation of privacy.
You're arguing your feelings, not law. There is no expectation (assumption) of privacy in public.
No I'm not missing anything. That's ONLY when there is an expectation of privacy, which there NEVER is in public.
Any state that tries to enforce it is in violation of federal law. It's freedom of press.
I suggest you watch some 1st amendment audit videos where auditors routinely prove your idea of what the law is wrong.
I need to correct something. If James O'Keefe is having a "private" conversation in say a restaurant on a "date" with someone in a 2 party state, then yes he needs permission to record the conversation. The person at the table next to them however does not. They person at the table next to them is in public, and anything that can be seen or heard in/from public can be recorded and disseminated to the public. That's basic first amendment.
That would ultimately have to go to the Supreme Court if someone was willing to fight it.
If they're in public, there's really not an expectation of privacy. O'Keefe is working as a journalist, in public. So which law prevails? Constitutional freedom of press, or the states two party consent?
It SHOULD be the constitution, but the courts don't always see it that way.
I want to add something to think about. Does a person have an expectation of privacy when having a private conversation with an undercover cop wearing a wire?
Why would it be different for press?
>that seems to be an infringement on the other persons rights
What rights? Again, according to law and the US Supreme Court you have absolutely no right to expect privacy in public.
I agree about the poorly constructed law. The US legal system is full of hypocrisy.
Yes they do, but there is still no expectation of privacy.
Why do you think robbery surveillance video can be shown on the news?
While I wouldn't be surprised if it was tried, she wouldn't win. That would open it up to criminals suing over surveillance video.
Not if it's open to the public. Why do you think people record fights in restaurants? Why do you think surveillance video is shown on the news?
There is an expectation of privacy in a bathroom. Nice strawman attempt though.
If audio recording, it's another one of those hypocrisies in the law. The store has to tell you, but the citizen in the store doesn't.
Those who post they are video recording do it as a deterrent.
A private business, even when open to the public, can ask you to leave for recording. If you don't, you're trespassing.
You're absolutely wrong. You know the law is not whatever you think it should be right?
>Not posted
It doesn't have to be for video, only audio, but how do you know if it's posted or not?
Those you're taught to trust the most.
>“Be careful not to practice your righteousness in front of others to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven. So when you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.
Still trying to argue for her non existent right to privacy huh?
I guess all those videos on youtube of fights in restaurants, robberies, etc should be sued over too huh?
Why so afraid of a little "light" on public behavior?