groped she has sucked off the entire front row I assume in one of them times square theaters.
depends on the state and where it came from.
calm your tits. Privacy first off is not a right I am not saying it should not be but some protection about privacy should be granted however she was in a public place during a public function hence depending on the state a public action and recording is fair game.
some do not require a two party consent though this is how on the street interviews are possible I think there are some that are still two party consent.
so if you are recorded on camera your expectation of privacy is null and void, IE ambush journalism. Because I thought that was only possible because of one party consent states because if it happened even in another state with the assumption of privacy like the under cover videos James Okeefe does, that would be a problem, because it was said under the assumption of privacy and not recording.
you seem to be missing either intentionally or because perhaps I am not stating it clearly but in reference to james o keefe the undercover stuff like when people go on dates would only be able to be done in a single party consent state, other wise it would be illegal. The issue with Lauren is she got her tits fondled in public and there is no assumption. Again the James stuff that is done with undercover dates specifically would only be able to be done if they were not required to get consent from the other party which some states still enforce.
Ok so the caviat I just looked it up is if the person recording it such as like on a date is the person recording it, but this does make an interesting argument since it seems the person who is doing the recording has to be participating in the conversation, which in some ways would make James O keefe and his recordings illegal since he is the one who is actually doing the recording and watching as it is a set up and sting. You are correct that anyone else in the restaurant could record them legally as they are in public. I think we are agreeing but the details change depending on who is recording and who is participating. Lauren just got caught being kinky in public.
>>19562351>>19562368
Answering your second thought first, I think its a good reasonable question about unreasonable search and seizure to, lie about who you are in a private conversation, causing you to possibly perjure yourself, I think personally both are an issue depending on how they are utilized. Case by case but That is part of the problem with the judicial system you have to fight it just to prove something that they over looked in their poorly constructed law. He is working as a journo but, if he is secretly recording with cameras utilizing actors to go on dates with marks, that seems to be an infringement on the other persons rights. It would also stop a lot of whistleblowers sadly because this is how this information is usually received, but again who is doing the recording that is the problem with the law its all based on semantics and nuance of language to manipulate.
What I am talking about would fall under wire tapping laws. The reason I thought those existed was because of the assumption of privacy in conversations. Now if you were in a public park and using a device to over hear someones conversation and record that, I think you can call that ok, but with the wire tapping laws the way I understand them about recording people, the person doing the recording has to be participating, so if an organization or group is recording will that same protection be granted. Since a group is not an individual participating. Perhaps the public angle gives some loophole also as opposed to maybe recording someone on the phone or something like that.
damn you are stupid. Thinking the theater owner is to blame.
most places with surveillance I thought had to have some posting saying they are recording. Serving as notification.
That is the biggest problem I can figure out the ways these things are broken, sure they are what if scenarios but that its the problem with the law, they never think what else the law does only that it exists. System needs total rework.
yeah you should stop talking you are being out right stupid now.
yay, no one cares what you think.
thank for proving what a fucking fag you are.
well then make it equal and let every elector get a handful. Seems only fair.
well at least anons know you are here now.