Tyb
[1] Delta for Mickey Mouse time
Dan Scavino
@DanScavino
Sep 17, 2023, 12:51 AM
https://truthsocial.com/@DanScavino/posts/111078687412058612
4730
Sep 16, 2020 4:51:34 PM EDT
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 4e4547 No. 10672384
61aiBqOMPAL_SL1000_.jpg
2577
Dec 10, 2018 10:58:47 PM EST
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 52a4e6 No. 4250634
>>4249648
+17 min DELTA between Tweets (cherry on top).
Q
whoa, every day in every way <3
only Q post with CVS
2463
Nov 09, 2018 6:50:16 PM EST
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 000000 No. 438
Nov 02, 2018 6:02:10 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 000000 No. 384
Nov 02, 2018 5:42:49 PM EDT
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: 000000 No. 383
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/upshot/election-2016-voting-precinct-maps.html?smid=fb-nytimes&smtyp=cur#3.56/39.58/-94.58
Cross reference 'blue' areas w/ illegal immigrant high pop zones.
You might be shocked what you discover.
The real TRUTH about why D's depend on illegal immigrants and why they care more about them than you.
#FactsMatter
Q

DrB4VioX0CoWeVX.jpg-large.jpg
>>383
https://twitter.com/TheGreatStorm/status/1058478239893598208
Amazing what you discover when you research for yourself.
God bless you, Patriots!
Q

DkQX69CVsAAgDZ7.jpg
>>384
Will recent [expected] voter fraud actions by the D party provide support for a VOTER ID LAW?
VOTER ID LAW = DEATH OF D PARTY.
Boomerang Suicide?
Q
1251
Neil Diamond - Cherry, Cherry (Audio)
2:42
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0QsTMqUfDDw
Q - The Plan to Save the World
https://rumble.com/vbd957-q-the-plan-to-save-the-world-1080p60.html
https://rumble.com/embed/v8r2yj/?pub=4
or what ever is shitty, allow it all the space it needs to become other…
sometimes sitting in you shitty thoughts or situation is the best thing to do
just sit in it
That Chicago Professor is fucking stupid.
MYSTERIOUS Flower That Blooms Every 3,000 YEARS Spotted Across Globe
334,264 views Sep 10, 2016
There's an ancient eastern Buddhist legend about the mysterious Udumbara flowers which blooms every 3,000 signaling the arrival of a celestial being. It has been turning up in the word since it's first sighting in South Korea in 1997 when they appeared on a Buddha statue. The flowers are said to be fragrant, resilient and can bloom on any surface and any object such as metal, wood, etc. Many people have documented this rare occurrence but there are people to say the flowers are the eggs of the Green Lacewing insect. However, it has been pointed out that the insect eggs will deteriorate once the larvae hatches but the mystical flowers do not decay for long periods of time.
Mike has seen two cases of his friends finding the flowers and keeping them intact for a long time.
The Buddhist legend foretells a Holy King Who Turns the Wheel, rectifying the Dharma in the world. This King is said to accept anyone of any religious affiliation, offering salvation to all through compassion.
In Volume 8 of the Buddhist scripture, it reads:
“Huilin Phonetics and Interpretation” states: “The udumbara flower is the product of propitious and supernatural phenomena; it is a celestial flower and does not exist in the mundane world. If a Tathagata or the King of the Golden Wheel appears in the human world, this flower will appear due to his great virtue and blessings.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNwwtZCNRPI
what are you suggestin?
Immunisation Agenda 2030: Bill Gates’ latest plan to vaccinate every man, woman and child on Earth
A UN-led global immunisation strategy was launched in April 2021 – the Immunisation Agenda 2030 (IA2030). It unites WHO, UNICEF, GAVI, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and other partners to focus on vaccination throughout life, from infancy through to adolescence and older age.
IA2030 sets an overarching global vision and strategy for vaccines and immunisation for the decade 2021–2030. The specified goal of their unprecedented agenda is to vaccinate every man, woman, and child on Earth by the year 2030.
“The covid-19 pandemic has reminded the world of the power of vaccines to fight disease, save lives, and create a healthier, safer, and more prosperous future,” WHO claims attempting to sell the IA2030 strategy. “Immunisation … is an indisputable human right. It’s also one of the best health investments money can buy.”
Is IA2030 UN-led?
According to the United Nations (“UN”), IA2030 is a UN-led global immunisation strategy. But we beg to differ considering the partnerships and the funding.
In April, Andrew Bridgen MP gave a speech during a Westminster Hall debate. “The second-largest donor after Germany is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and I think Gavi is the fifth, so if we add those together, they are the biggest donors to the WHO,” he said.
Bill & Melinda Gates set up their Foundation in 1994. Since then, vaccines have become the Gates Foundation’s biggest investment. In 1999, the Gates Foundation set up the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (“GAVI”).
GAVI is a public-private partnership between UN agencies, governments, the vaccine industry, the private sector and civil society. GAVI’s partners are the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (the key partner), the World Health Organisation (“WHO”), the United Nations Children’s Fund (“UNICEF”) and the World Bank.
IA2030’s partners are WHO, UNICEF, GAVI and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Excepting for the World Bank, IA2030 partners are GAVI’s partners. And, GAVI’s founder and key partner is Bill Gates. So, we can assume that IA2030 is, in fact, a Gates initiative.
It is not the first time Gates has attempted to profiteer from vaccinating the world. In 2012, at the World Health Assembly, Bill Gates became the leader of the 2012-2020 Global Vaccine Action Plan (“GVAP”), the global immunisation plan of the so-called “decade of vaccines.” According to Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger, in 2016, an assessment of GVAP showed that the plan to vaccinate the world had failed. “They were very upset because they did not [vaccinate] the whole world,” she told Reiner Fuellmich early last year.
WHO is Lying to You
Before we get to IA2030, it is important to put WHO’s documents into context and to establish the integrity of WHO’s statements about vaccines. To demonstrate that WHO is not truthful to the public, below is a comparison of what is said by a senior WHO official in promotional material to what was said at a WHO summit.
On 2 to 3 December 2019, WHO convened the Global Vaccine Safety Summit in Geneva, Switzerland. The summit aimed to “take stock of [the] accomplishments” of WHO’s Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety (GACVS) and to work toward finalising the agency’s Global Vaccine Safety Blueprint 2.0 strategy 2021-2030.
On 28 November 2019, paediatrician Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, WHO’s Chief Scientist, assured the public in a commercial that “vaccines are very safe” and that vaccine safety tracking is robust, and examining the data lets them promptly address problems. They are “thoroughly monitored.”
Four days later, at the WHO Global Vaccine Safety Summit, Dr. Swaminathan admitted: “We really don’t have very good safety monitoring systems in many countries. We can’t give answers about the deaths. We need to put mechanisms in place to monitor what’s going on. With many drugs, we only learn about adverse events after they are introduced to the populations.”
And she was not the only one expressing concerns about vaccine safety at the Summit. For a summary list of quotes from attendees at the Summit in the 56-minute video below condensed from Highwire, see the description below the video on YouTube.
If the video above is removed from YouTube, you can find the full show on The Highwire’s website HERE.
Further reading:
Scientists at WHO Global Summit Confirm the Absence of Vaccine Safety Science, Alliance for Human Research Protection, 31 January 2023
Anatomy of Corruption: WHO Public Health Guidelines, Alliance for Human Research Protection, 30 January 2023
The WHO Vaccination Agenda 2030: a Global PhRMA Strategy, Alliance for Human Research Protection, 30 January 2023
How did the Member States Vote for IA2030?
They didn’t.
In August 2020, the Seventy-third World Health Assembly (“WHA”), through the written silence procedure, endorsed the new global vision and overarching strategy for vaccines and immunisation: Immunisation Agenda 2030 (IA2030).
The written silence procedure is when the Director General transmits to the Member States a proposal for consideration and then sets a deadline within which written objections need to be submitted. In this case, within 14 days from the date of dispatch of the Director General’s communication.
“In absence of the receipt by the set date of any written objection from a Member State, the proposal concerned will be considered as having been validly adopted by the Health Assembly,” the Written Silence Procedure rules for the WHA stated.
While the covid pandemic prevented in-person meetings, conveniently, non-governmental organisations took advantage of the situation and adopted the “silence procedure.” Along with WHO, the UN General Assembly and UN Economic and Social Council also adopted the practice.
Qui tacet consentire videtur – “silence means consent.” Democracy at its finest!
What are IA2030’s Targets?
Targets to be achieved by 2030 include:
Achieving 90% coverage for essential vaccines given in childhood and adolescence.
Halving the number of children completely missing out on vaccines which WHO labels as “zero dose” children.
Completing 500 national or subnational introductions of new or under-utilised vaccines – such as those for covid-19, rotavirus, or human papillomavirus (HPV)
How Will WHO Measure Progress?
You can find details on how IA2030’s targets will be measured by following the hyperlinks ‘Explore Data’ on THIS webpage. Below are excerpts from a few of what WHO terms ‘Impact Goal Indicators’. It gives a good indication of what vaccines they will be pushing onto populations and when – to be forewarned is to be forearmed.
Impact Goal 1.1: Modelled estimates project the number of lives that “will be saved” from 2021-2030 by achieving IA2030’s aspirational coverage targets for WHO-recommended vaccines. Estimates are included for global and regional deaths prevented through the administration of vaccines against 14 diseases.
The initial scope focuses on 14 pathogens, which will be expanded to update the estimates at the midpoint of IA2030.
2021-2030: Hepatitis B, Hib, HPV, JE, measles, MenA, Streptococcus pneumoniae, rotavirus, rubella, yellow fever, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, TB (BCG)
By 2025: Polio, typhoid, influenza, cholera, multivalent meningitis, covid-19, varicella, dengue, mumps, rabies, hepatitis A, hepatitis E, and other new vaccines.
Impact Goal 1: Prevent Disease, 1.1 Saves Lives, IA2030 Scorecard – Global, Immunisation Agenda 2030
Impact Goal 1.3: Globally, the IA2030 target is 90% for coverage of these four vaccines – DTP (diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis), measles, pneumococcal disease, and HPV.
Impact Goal 2.2: The target is 500 vaccine introductions in low- and middle-income countries by 2030, including current new or under-utilised vaccine introductions (NUVI) as well as vaccines that will be recommended over the decade.
Introductions are defined as addition of a vaccine to the national immunisation schedule … New or underutilised vaccines are defined as vaccines that have not yet been introduced into national immunisation schedules in all countries where recommended by WHO.
Vaccines included in this indicator that are recommended by WHO for use in national immunisation schedules in all countries: HepB birth dose, Hib, HPV, IPV2, MCV2, PCV, rotavirus, rubella, DTP booster (currently reporting the fourth dose at any age), and covid-19 (interim recommendation). Vaccines included in this indicator that are recommended by WHO for use in national immunisation schedules in countries in certain geographic region(s), in some high-risk populations, or in immunisation programmes with certain characteristics: YF, JE, MenA, multivariate meningitis, typhoid, cholera, dengue, rabies, HepA, influenza, varicella, and mumps.
Impact Goal 2: Promote Equity, 2.2 Provide access to all vaccines, IA2030 Scorecard – Global, Immunisation Agenda 2030
Why are they targeting the introduction of so many vaccines in low- and middle-income countries (“LMICs”)? The European Immunisation Agenda 2030 gives a clue:
Immunisation has a high return on investments, especially in LMICs. In a recent study on the return in investments from immunisation in 94 LMICs, the return on every dollar invested was estimated at almost USD 20 between 2021–2030.
European Immunisation Agenda 2030, 2021, pg. 3
What Does IA2030 Say?
IA2030 envisions a world where everyone, everywhere, at every age, fully benefits from vaccines
Immunisation is playing a critical role in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) … Immunisation critical to SDG3 – to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages. Because health is so fundamental to development, IA2030 will also contribute – either directly or indirectly – to 13 of the other SDGs.
Immunisation Agenda 2030: A Global Strategy to Leave No One Behind, World Health Organisation
The following are extracts from the Immunisation Agenda 2030 dated 1 April 2020. For ease of reference, the page numbers where the text appears in the 60-page document are noted in square brackets at the end of the paragraph.
Lessons
Lessons from the Global Vaccine Action Plan: The Global Vaccine Action Plan (GVAP) was the global immunization strategy of the “Decade of vaccines” (2011–2020). Developed through extensive global consultations, GVAP brought together existing goals to eradicate and eliminate diseases and set new global goals that accounted for the full spectrum of functions of immunization programmes. The review of experience with GVAP in 2019 revealed important lessons for the decade to 2030. [pg. 18]
Life-course approach. The growing number of new vaccines administered after childhood is opening frontiers for national immunisation programmes and will require new methods for delivery. Furthermore, booster doses should be introduced for lifelong protection against diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus. IA2030 has a stronger focus on extending the benefits of vaccination throughout the life-course. [pg. 25]
Strengthening partnerships beyond health. The future of immunisation will increasingly be based on integration and collaboration with stakeholders within and beyond health. IA2030 proposes closer collaboration with existing and new partners. Such enhanced collaboration will have mutual advantages, extending the benefits of immunisation while helping others to achieve their goals. [pg. 25]
Accelerating innovation. A more nimble, robust research agenda offers new opportunities to meet future challenges. IA2030 focuses on not only the development of new vaccines but also accelerating innovation to improve programme performance, surveillance and quality and to increase access to data, drawing on lessons from other sectors. [pg. 26]
Strategic Priority 3: Everyone is protected by full immunisation, regardless of location, age, socioeconomic status or gender-related barriers. [pg. 36]
Strategic Priority 4: All people benefit from recommended immunisations throughout the life-course. [pg. 38]
Strategic Priority 4. Key areas of focus. Tracking vaccination status: Institute policies for monitoring vaccination coverage at different ages and facilitating administration of vaccines throughout the life-course. [pg. 38]
Strategic Priority 4. Application of the core principles. People-centred: Vaccination throughout the life-course is integrated into other health care services for different age groups. [pg. 39]
Strategic Priority 4. Application of the core principles. Data-guided: Implementation and social and behavioural research will be conducted to generate evidence for effective delivery of integrated, coordinated packages of vaccination services and to identify new contact points for vaccination throughout the life course. [pg. 39]
https://expose-news.com/2023/09/16/immunisation-agenda-2030-bill-gates-latest-plan/
how does this make you feel?
I feel the same, sick to my stomach when you bible bash me
I hate your beliefs and am fucking over you talking to me
jesus dick sucker
kill your self already
The Armed Man Who Gave RFK Jr. Assassination Scare Has Been Identified
by Becker NewsSeptember 16, 2023Featured
Presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has repeatedly sought Secret Service protection from the federal government due to persistent threats to his safety, but his requests have been denied.
Unfortunately, on Saturday night in Los Angeles, the concerns of his campaign turned into a reality when an armed individual impersonating a federal marshal appeared at a campaign event.
The man has now been identified as 44-Year-Old Adrian Paul Aispuro.
JUST IN — The Armed Man Who Tried to Enter the @RobertKennedyJr Event Last Night Has Been Identified as 44-Year-Old Adrian Paul Aispuro
Aispuro is currently being held in Los Angeles on $35,000 bail for a felony charge of carrying a concealed weapon. pic.twitter.com/a2DNMiDNtS
— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd) September 16, 2023
According to reports, the man is being held in Los Angeles on $35,000 bail for a felony charge of carrying a concealed weapon.
At around 4:30 pm, police were alerted to a disturbance at the Wilshire Ebell Theatre. According to reports from Breitbart, the police indicated that “a male was in front of the event venue with ‘a badge on their lapel, a gun, and a shoulder holster, and claimed to be a U.S. Marshal.'”
Despite his claims of being part of the event staff, no one from the staff could confirm his identity. A note, shared with Breitbart by an officer present at the scene and addressed to the campaign, stated: “Male impersonating a federal agent with a handgun and exposed ammunition. He claimed to be employed for the event but was not recognized by security.”
Video footage captured the moment when the man was handcuffed and taken away by officers from the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD).
“I’m very grateful that alert and fast-acting protectors from Gavin de Becker and Associates (GDBA) spotted and detained an armed man who attempted to approach me at my Hispanic Heritage speech at the Wilshire Ebell Theatre in Los Angeles tonight,” Kennedy said in a statement. “The man, wearing two shoulder holsters with loaded pistols and spare ammunition magazines was carrying a U.S. Marshal badge on a lanyard and beltclip federal ID. He identified himself as a member of my security detail. Armed GDBA team members moved quickly to isolate and detain the man until LAPD arrived to make the arrest. I’m also grateful to LAPD for its rapid response.”
I’m very grateful that alert and fast-acting protectors from Gavin de Becker and Associates (GDBA) spotted and detained an armed man who attempted to approach me at my Hispanic Heritage speech at the Wilshire Ebell Theatre in Los Angeles tonight. The man, wearing two shoulder… pic.twitter.com/vvJc0Gtk4o
— Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) September 16, 2023
“I’m still entertaining a hope that President Biden will allow me Secret Service protection,” he continued. “I am the first presidential candidate in history to whom the White House has denied a request for protection.”
https://beckernews.com/the-armed-man-who-gave-rfk-jr-assassination-scare-has-been-identified-51696/
Texas Lt. Gov. Unloads on ‘Indefensible’ Paxton Impeachment
by Becker NewsSeptember 16, 2023Featured
Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick unloads on the state legislators who rammed through an impeachment of Attorney General Ken Paxton after his acquittal on all 16 charges on Saturday.
“Members, I have just a few minutes of comments. About five minutes,” he said. “I’ve been unusually quiet for the last three months since the House of Representatives sent the articles of impeachment against Attorney General to us on very short notice in the final hours of the regular legislative session. The law requires the Senate to receive the articles and have a trial, and once I realized I would be the presiding officer and judge, I thought it was my duty to be quiet on this issue. Otherwise, how could I oversee a fair trial? I’ve done my very best to do so the last three months, especially the last two weeks. Now the trial is over. I want to take a few minutes before we close to put a few remarks in the court record for future legislatures to read in the event of another impeachment one day on both what the House and Senate did.”
“I’ve spent most of the last 90 days, as many of you have, preparing for this trial,” he added. “I’ve issued over 240 subpoenas. I’ve studied numerous motions, written multiple orders, read hundreds of pages of history, rules, documents, and worked on every detail of this trial with you and with our incredible Secretary of the Senate, the clerk of the court who turned this chamber into a courtroom and her great staff. I have had a total view of this process from the very first day, the House sent over the articles of impeachment to us in May.”
“With all due respect to the House, we didn’t need to be told in the final arguments how important this vote was,” he continued. “I believe the quote was, ‘this will… be the hardest and most difficult and the heaviest vote that you’ll ever cast in your time in the legislature.’ This vote will be the vote you’re remembered for most’.”
“Our members already knew that and have known that for the last three months,” he went on. “If only the House members who voted for impeachment would’ve followed that instruction in the house. We may not have been here. In the House, the vote to send the articles of impeachment against the Attorney General to the Senate happened in only a few days with virtually no time for 150 members to even study the articles.”
“The Speaker and his team rammed through the first impeachment of the statewide official in Texas in over 100 years while paying no attention to the precedent that the House set in every other impeachment before in the past,” Patrick said. “The House had transparent and open investigations for all to see, including other House members. The target of the investigation was notified and invited to attend with counsel and given an opportunity to cross-examine witnesses that were placed under oath before testimony was taken. At the conclusion of past House investigations, the evidence was laid out for weeks for House members to evaluate, not hours before they took their vote on articles of impeachment.”
“Representative John Smithee, a longtime House member who has argued cases before the Texas Supreme Court, spoke on the House floor during impeachment vote in May,” he added. “He was one of only 23 who voted against impeachment. Representative Smithee said the House could not legitimately impeach General Paxton on the record because there was no record sent to the Senate. He said ‘the House was not following the rule of law.’ He said, the House’s approach — and I quote Representative Smithee — ‘hang them now and judge them later’.”
“Representative Smithee told his fellow members the House process was indefensible,” Patrick would go on to say. “Representative Smithee said the House did not follow the rules of evidence, and their case was based on ‘triple hearsay’ that would never be allowed in court. I think Representative Smithee’s speech was one of the most honest and courageous speeches I’ve ever heard of in the House, and if you want to watch it online, go to YouTube.
Look up John Smithee. That’s his floor speech on the Paxton impeachment. It’s an amazing, courageous speech to give when he knew he was only one of 23 not voting for impeachment.”
“In the next regular session, we should amend the Constitution,” Patrick said. “The issue of impeachment is currently written that allowed this flawed process to happen. Any testimony given in a House impeachment investigation must be given under oath and the target of that impeachment must be allowed to present with a lawyer to cross examinee the witnesses. Otherwise, people can say anything they want without any accountability or need to be truthful. Because there is no threat of perjury.”
“The House must also give members a minimum of two weeks to review all evidence given under oath before voting on such a serious matter,” he added. “Had they done those two things, this trial may never have happened. And when the House sends articles of impeachment to the Senate, if they do in the future, the officials should not be put on unpaid leave through the process. The federal system does not allow that. Why do we allow that in Texas?”
“President Clinton and President Trump did not have to step down from the Oval Office from their duties during their impeachment process,” he noted. “And members, this is not a partisan issue. We owe it to future legislatures to make these changes so that no future official impeached by the House, whether Republican, Democrat, or independent, is subject to the way this impeachment process occurred in the House.”
Then, Lt. Gov. Patrick called for a full audit of the Paxton impeachment.
“This year, millions of taxpayer dollars have been wasted on this impeachment,” Patrick said. “31 Senators and a large Senate staff that made this trial possible have put their family life, their jobs, their business will hold for the last three months after already being here from January to June.”
“I’m going to call next week for a full audit of all taxpayer money spent by the House from the beginning of their investigation in March to their final bills they get from their lawyers,” he said. “We will provide our cost as well that were forced on us by the House impeachment. One big difference. We didn’t pay a huge team of outside lawyers and investigators. We did it mostly with our own staff, working endless hours with no extra pay.”
“As Representative Smithee, he said, ‘this is not the way it has happened in the past in the House.’ That’s why I believe we’ve only had two prior impeachments. Our founders expected better. It should have never happened this year, and hopefully it doesn’t again unless we address this in the Constitution.”
After eight days of testimony from both sides, a total of 30 state senators cast their votes on Saturday to either “acquit” or “remove from office” Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton based on “16 articles of impeachment.”
The Texas state senators voted to acquit Paxton on all counts.
Additionally, the state Senate decided to “dismiss” the four articles of impeachment that were “held in abeyance” with a 19–11 vote.
“Today, the truth prevailed. The truth could not be buried by mudslinging politicians or their powerful benefactors. I’ve said many times: Seek the truth! And that is what was accomplished,” Paxton said in a statement after the acquittal.
Attorney General Ken Paxton will now be able to resume office and get on with doing the business of Texans.
https://beckernews.com/texas-lt-gov-unloads-on-indefensible-paxton-impeachment-51692/