when a book promotes genital mutilation muh covenant, one has to wonder if a creator would do such a thing, that creator would have created everything and now would basically admit to a mistake? Makes no sense.
There are also reasons for that to exist in the first place, and thus the creator wouldn't have made a mistake, and thus no reason to cut it off.
Logical explanation: either fully controlled or at least edited. Can't figure out which, or how much.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_source
Versions of this reconstructed Q do not describe the events of Jesus' life: Q does not mention Jesus' birth, his selection of the 12 disciples, his crucifixion, or the resurrection. Instead, it appears to be a collection of Jesus' sayings and quotations.
It's all FAYK.
It's all FAYK.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6474533/
"Homicides" or "natural" causes
Conclusion
The literature has been traced on the rate of covert homicide in SIDS, whether for a single death or in multiple deaths. The use of a percentage – e.g., the notion that 10% of SIDS are homicides – is problematic because the rate of sudden death in infancy has fallen, making percentages less valuable. The developing literature suggests that the initial figures were overestimates. The rate of homicide was based upon opinion and the evidence has been called uncontrolled, circumstantial, anecdotal, and indirect. However, the literature is clear that some sudden deaths in infancy are covert homicides, though the percentage is low. Similarly, whether multiple cases of SIDS are all homicides or could be from natural causes remains controversial. The different approaches to this problem may also reflect jurisdictional differences. For example, medical examiners certify manner, but some forensic pathologists in a coroner's system do not. Some may also have been influenced by such philosophical approaches to infant death investigation as “think dirty”, an approach that was promulgated in Ontario (33).