still tripping from your intentional overdose of mushrooms?
>>19567154 (pb)
are you deranged or what?
Did you slander me by calling me a > > hater?
if you did I expect an apology. Now!
ah . . . one of the things about tripping is that you think you're mind is 'clear' but your reasoning is still all messed up.
takes a couple of days and even then . . . when you take spicy foods you might get a residual effect . . . or if you start burning body fats . . .
what would he have been called in years past?
a 'newphag'?
ya, when ever it hangs up I always wait to see if my post posted and then, maybe, if it didn't post, I post again.
but often it does post, and other times I think better of it and don't try again.
seem pretty clear he said 'I don't like using names on people double' meaning
he has names he uses, but he doesn't use the same name for two people.
clear as a bell to me. He's said the same thing before and even explained that he took the name he had used for Hillary and applied it to Joe. And since he 'doesn't like to use names on people double' he needed a new name for Beautiful Hillary.
another point: he didn't say 'people doubles' he said 'people double'.
and if he'd meant 'the doubles of people' it would have been "peoples' doubles" or "people's doubles"
you even get it write put writing people without a possessive either s-appostrophy, or appostrophy-s (depending if it's singular or plural).
it's a strange idiom that he used, and perhaps a little bit idiosyncratic.
my point is : give it up. He was talking about his well known use of nicknames for his rivals and associates. He doesn't use the same nickname for two different people.
that's all he meant, not that the current Beautiful Hillary is a double
the brain dropping is untrue because it imagines that a person is all alone in the world.
other people know truths that you will never know, and thus will never have confirmed.
so thus your statement is what I like to call a 'false platitude' or 'false aphorism'
now the double poster has IP hopped.
oh my.
wait, the other option is that it was deleted and I reset the bread . . .
the active deletion of shills content is the new normal here.
if you do not refresh the bread you maintain those posts which BV have deemed to be unsuitible for their reasons (usually because they speak of . . . or it's well known spam).
so the post count if you don't refresh will run over 751 posts.
simple.
what many do is leave one bread open and have it in another tab which you keep refreshing.
that way if you want you can review the deleted posts.
what I find upon review of deleted posts is usually it shill posts I would have filtered anyway.
https://www.bostonherald.com/2023/09/17/wwi-era-plane-crashes-at-american-heritage-museum/
"WWI-era plane crashes at American Heritage Museum "
This plane crash occurred today in Stow, Massachusetts.
"Armed man impersonating officer arrested at Kennedy event"
https://www.bostonherald.com/2023/09/17/armed-man-impersonating-officer-arrested-at-kennedy-event/