Anonymous ID: 5cc1d9 Sept. 18, 2023, 7:48 a.m. No.19571671   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1727 >>1855

Dr. Doug Corrigan

@ScienceWDrDoug

As a society, we continue to recklessly develop insanely dangerous experimental protocols without even flinching.

 

Published just a few weeks ago, this study reports on creating human grafted lung tissue in humanized mice in order to create a human model for Nipah virus infection and pathology.

 

https://twitter.com/ScienceWDrDoug/status/1703425305082253747

 

Convenient timing…UN/WHO Zero Draft Pandemic Public Declaration is in two days…

Anonymous ID: 5cc1d9 Sept. 18, 2023, 8:16 a.m. No.19571810   🗄️.is 🔗kun

https://unherd.com/thepost/mayors-initiative-calls-for-car-dairy-and-meat-ban-by-2030/

 

==Mayors’ initiative calls for car, dairy and meat ban by 2030

C40 Cities recently unveiled a raft of radical green proposals==

 

London Mayor Sadiq Khan speaks at the C40 World Mayors Summit in Buenos Aires last year. Credit: Getty

A climate change initiative, spearheaded by London Mayor Sadiq Khan, is recommending against buying more than three items of clothing a year, privately owning a car and flying more than once every three years. The C40 Climate Leadership group comprises, in its own words, “a network of nearly 100 mayors of the world’s leading cities that are united in action to confront the climate crisis”, and has commissioned a report making suggestions for how cities can halve their greenhouse gas emissions by 2030.

 

Khan, who chairs the C40 group, has received backlash from Londoners following this month’s Ulez expansion. Though the C40 Cities initiative, under the guise of the Clean Air Wins campaign, has shared videos in favour of Ulez, the Wall Street Journal this week highlighted the less highly-publicised proposals in its report, authored in collaboration with the University of Leeds, such as “no meat, no dairy and no private vehicles”. Also suggested is travelling by plane only once every three years, which the WSJ compares to the policies of “climate lockdowns”.

 

Like what you’re reading? Get the free UnHerd daily email

Already registered? Sign in

 

The report prescribes various “consumption interventions”, without outlining how these measures would be implemented. Reducing meat consumption to zero by 2030 is a listed target, but there is little in the way of detail about how this intervention could be achieved.

 

 

C40 Cities employs 433 people worldwide, according to LinkedIn, with headquarters in London, New York and Rio De Janeiro. Its website, however, provides few concrete examples of what C40 is actually doing. Real-life activities are buried under idealistic calls for “action now” and essays detailing milestones achieved by member cities. Yet money is pouring into C40. The UK arm of the company alone received £11m in grants and other funding in 2022. More than £7m of that money was spent on its own staff.

 

In November 2021, the UK Government invested £27 million in C40’s Urban Climate Action Plan (UCAP). While the initiative’s site claims that from 2018 to 2021 it “provided technical assistance and resources to 35 cities to develop climate action plans that effectively reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance climate resilience”, the nature of this assistance and resources is not expanded upon.

 

 

The cities involved in UCAP seem equally at a loss. A less-than-clear summary of Accra’s involvement in UCAP can be found on the Accra Metropolitan Assembly website: “the delivery of the programme has included technical assistance for regional and local convenings, the development of knowledge products and a policy framework, capacity building, and informal sector integration advocacy campaigns.”

 

C40’s financial backers include extremely influential organisations and corporations, including Google, the Clinton Foundation and the World Bank, as well as the businessman and philanthropist George Soros. This support network of ideologically aligned leaders gives the C40 group serious heft, even if its activities aren’t widely known among the broader public.

 

There is acknowledgement of this undeniable influence in the report, which states that “the network of C40 Cities can use their global spending power to speed up a transition to low-carbon production,” making use of “immediate and ambitious action”. This action won’t just be top-down, however: for the C40 initiative, “it is critical that large-scale behavioural changes occur as soon as possible.”

Anonymous ID: 5cc1d9 Sept. 18, 2023, 8:27 a.m. No.19571859   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>19571743

>>19571777

>>19571817

>>19571829

>>19571821

 

Can the government suspend the Constitution?

Asked by: Maria Senger | Last update: July 6, 2022

Score: 4.5/5 (74 votes)

Katyal. The Suspension Clause protects liberty by protecting the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus. It provides that the federal government may not suspend this privilege except in extraordinary circumstances: whena rebellion or invasionoccurs and the public safety requires it.

 

Can the Constitution of the United States be suspended?

The writ of habeas corpus, as specified in Article I, section 9, is the lone provision of the Constitution which may be suspended – and even then, only in "cases of rebellion or invasion."Under the Constitution the writ could be suspended during a period of national emergency

 

https://legalknowledgebase.com/can-the-government-suspend-the-constitution