>>19570765

Kek. The problem with your strawman argument is simple. Sure, not all Jews are evil satanic pieces of shit who want to enslave the world's population, due to their self-deluded religious-superiority complex of "chosen" status, but the majority of them protect the ones who are. Until "Jews" actively and vocally stand up to bullshit the "evil Jews" are doing (picsrel), they're no better than the ones doing said evil. You need to work on your lawfare…

"Anaccessoryis a person who assists in, but does not actually participate in, the commission of a crime. The distinction between an accessory and a principal is a question of fact and degree:

The principal is the one whose acts or omissions, accompanied by the relevant mens rea (Latin for "guilty mind"), are the most immediate cause of the actus reus (Latin for "guilty act").

If two or more people are directly responsible for the actus reus, they can be charged as joint principals (see common purpose). The test to distinguish a joint principal from an accessory is whether the defendant independently contributed to causing the actus reus rather than merely giving generalised and/or limited help and encouragement."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accessory_(legal_term)

>>19570779

>Cirrhosis

Licorice can help. Not the fake, red kind.

>>19571233

Rippers:

Facebook - https://fdown.net/

Rumble - https://videodownloader.so/rumble-video-downloader

Telegram - https://steptodown.com/telegram-video-downloader/#url=https://t.me/hsretoucher17/10408

X/Twitter - https://ssstwitter.com/

>>19571272

Kek. Notabru it. I'm tired of Anons asking how to rip vids off social media.

>>19571292

It's what I'm here for, Anon. We're not going to win this war without archives. There will come a time when it will be up to us to tell history.

>>19571282

>Shouldn't you blame all Christians as well, hypocrite?

Your projection is noted. But….. I'll play your game. As soon as there is a Christian NGO that has the power to shut down 60% of ad-revenue for a business, like the ADL does, I'll go just as hard after them, too. As soon as I see individual Christians calling for the genocide of an entire group of people, based off their skin color or pretending to be said skin color to sow hate against said group, I'll go after them as well. Contrary to what you want to project, I abhor ALL forms of supremacy…..

And that includes the Jewish variety.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/accessory

>>19571343

>Isn't accusing someone of a crime, of which they were adjudicated

Depends. What's the context?

>>19571378

Except we were discussing Jews, not Catholics. Why the deflection? Clearly you didn't look at the images I posted. eyeroll

Kek. Where's all the BO/BV's for the MuhJim (tm) spam? They were all vacant during the gore/torture shill spam the other night. Cleaned it up after the fact.

Funny how that works.

>>19571415

That's not entirely true. In order for a crime to be committed there has to be an injured party.

AGAIN, I'm going to ask, what is the context?

>>19571430

I made an opine, Anon. It would behoove you to understand the definition of said term. Being a moran doesn't suit you.

>>19571444

Kek. I'm going to leave you with the response I received for the same opine.

>>19571450

So….. you're not going to tell me the context on your asking about defamation, slander and libel? Oh well, I guess you don't want my help, Anon. If I say "You're a Fag, Anon!" that's not defamation, slander or libel, as there's no injured party. Now, if I were to say, "Anon murdered 6 gorillion people" and your job FIRED you for it, THEN it becomes a case of defamation, as there is an injured party.

You should really get yourself a copy of Black's Law.

>>19571378

>Let me quote what you wrote:

>"but the majority of them protect the ones who are. Until "Jews" actively and vocally stand up to bullshit the "evil Jews" are doing"

If you're going to quote me, "Anon," I suggest you do so in full and NOT in a context that suits your narrative. I said, verbatim in toto:

Sure,not all Jews are evil satanic pieces of shit who want to enslave the world's population, due to their self-deluded religious-superiority complex of "chosen" status, but the majority of them protect the ones who are.

When you snip quotations to suit your narrative, it's disingenuous.

>>19571499

Kek. You big mad. You deserve a lulz.

>>19571527

And you appear to be IP hopping. Your text gives you away, "Anon."

>You are judging people, but only some people in one way, and other people in a different way.

Indeed….

>>19571605

>There are many "Messianic Jews".

Confirmed

I know an entire family of them. Strictly study the Torah and the Torah only. Revere Jesus as the Son of God. Known them damn near 40 years. As a matter of fact, their son is the legal guardian of my children, should anything happen to WifeAnon or me.

>>19571654

Kek. Before I clicked that shit, I thought it was Ellen Page.

>>19571698

>As others have pointed out, there are Jews who believe in Jesus.

Yup. Clearly they've never heard of Brother Nathanel.

https://rumble.com/v37nk0c-i-get-letters.html

>>19571738

There's a TON of comms in BSG. They knew and that was during the Bush Administration.

>>19571759

Indeed. One of my favorite scenes.

>>19571780

>toaster

>>19571796

I grew up on the original. I'm partial to the Cylon War-era Centurions. Granted, the reimagined versions look WAY better than the football players in suits from the 70s.

>>19571822

I had the Viper and Raider that shot missiles. The ones they took off the market, when some dumb kid choked on one, due to his being a moran. I wish I still had them. I have a 3D print I did of the Bucket in my home office. Kek. It's so big, I had to do it in sections.

>>19571844

Eldest SonAnon wanted to watch BSG with me. He didn't make it past 33. Couldn't handle them shooting down the Olympic Carrier. I did, however, make sure to show him Pegasus' sacrifice.