After rematching "VAXXED: From Cover-up to Catastrophe" again yesterday, I have a hypothesis about where this could be going.

If a person making money from YT content starts getting truthful about certain subjects they will lose monetization and/or their account. To me the two big "truth bombs" are 1. Vaccine dangers and 2. Election fraud.

As things unfold I think that we will know the real "white hats" by their willingness to speak the truth even if they lose money or a social media account. If someone remained silent about election fraud and/or the vaccine bioweapons to preserve their "monetization" their "god" appears to be mammon. A person cannot serve two masters.

The subject matter of VAXXED was a study done, I believe in 2001. This means that credible evidence of a relationship between vaccination with MMR and the development of autism has been covered-up for over 20 years. Dan Burton and Bill Posey were the two members of Congress who wanted to get to the bottom of this. You can see how far they got. Congress, imo does or should know that vaccines are way more harmful than the public knows and its obviously not just the COVID injections, either. With rigged elections (the other major censored topic) there is no incentive to care about the people at all.

>>19581850

>rematching

rewatching

>>19581879

Do you have an idea of how this will affect 2nd and 3rd tier suppliers?

I worked in a factory that supplied parts to the auto industry (among other things, interestingly enough). They were hanging on last I knew, but if they lose automaker business for a while (don't know how the contracts work to be honest) I think it could shut down some of the plants. If they did shut down, workers in my city would lose jobs even though they are non-union poor American and poor immigrant workers. Honestly, though, I met some of the best people there.