Anonymous ID: 335174 Sept. 20, 2023, 11:51 a.m. No.19583841   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3941 >>3962 >>3984 >>4009 >>4121 >>4210 >>4235

Jack Smith projection. Smith claims:

 

"And on August 2, the defendant posted a quote alleging, without any basis, that the indictment that a federal grand jury in this case returned had been directed by the sitting president: โ€œโ€˜Joe Biden directed his Attorney General to prosecute his rival. This is not an independent Justice Department, this is not an independent special counsel. This is being directed by the Commander-in-Chief.โ€ Through such posts, the defendant is attempting to submit his false and inflammatory claims to the public and jury pool outside of court, because he knows that any such claims made before the Court in the form of motions to suppress or of vindictive prosecution will fail because they must be supported by evidenceโ€”of which there is none."

 

By his own logic, since he doesn't have ANY evidence that Trump did anything wrong, his entire sham special prosecutor investigation bas to be silenced/shut down.

 

If Smith can SPEAK without evidence, why can't Trump?

 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/09/20/special-counsel-jack-smiths-expansive-gag-order-would-ban-trump-from-criticizing-biden/