>If Anons are doing anything special to post, please list it a new post, so other Anons can figure out how to post.
They are sending me $5 and I open the door ;P LOL I'm a Nigerian Prince….
Sola scriptura is not the right to be infallible in the your interpretation of the Bible. That statement alone disqualifies him from having even a sensible opinion on the matter,
I do not believe in Sola Scriptura. But I know what it means. It means that the written word is sufficient to discern the things of God. It speaks of the word, not your ability.
The Bible? which one. Bibles are collections of writings. They differ. You cannot have this conversation if you don't recognize that.
Jesus did not have a Bible. He had Jewish writings. 'Scripture' simply means 'writings'.
Which ones are important? Probably the ones Jesus used. Is there something different about them? Yes. They have a second layer of meaning hidden in prophetic riddle.
When Jesus read the writings, he did not see Adam, Moses and Abraham. He saw himself in them. this is only possible if they have double meaning.
The Apocrypha does not have the second layer; neither does Enoch.
To see the second layer, you must solve the riddles in Hebrew, though you can see much of it in any language. The writings Jesus used do not need other writings to interpret the riddle. They are self-contained. They do need the teaching of the Spirit to see in a verifiable and reproducible manner.
The reason there are so many interpretations is because people stopped listening.
Sola scriptura is not the right to be infallible in the your interpretation of the Bible. That statement alone disqualifies him from having even a sensible opinion on the matter,
I do not believe in Sola Scriptura. But I know what it means. It means that the written word is sufficient to discern the things of God. It speaks of the word, not your ability.
The Bible? which one. Bibles are collections of writings. They differ. You cannot have this conversation if you don't recognize that.
Jesus did not have a Bible. He had Jewish writings. 'Scripture' simply means 'writings'.
Which ones are important? Probably the ones Jesus used. Is there something different about them? Yes. They have a second layer of meaning hidden in prophetic riddle.
When Jesus read the writings, he did not see Adam, Moses and Abraham. He saw himself in them. this is only possible if they have double meaning.
The Apocrypha does not have the second layer; neither does Enoch.
To see the second layer, you must solve the riddles in Hebrew, though you can see much of it in any language. The writings Jesus used do not need other writings to interpret the riddle. They are self-contained. They do need the teaching of the Spirit to see in a verifiable and reproducible manner.
The reason there are so many interpretations is because people stopped listening.
Sola scriptura is not the right to be infallible in the your interpretation of the Bible. That statement alone disqualifies him from having even a sensible opinion on the matter,
I do not believe in Sola Scriptura. But I know what it means. It means that the written word is sufficient to discern the things of God. It speaks of the word, not your ability.
The Bible? which one. Bibles are collections of writings. They differ. You cannot have this conversation if you don't recognize that.
Jesus did not have a Bible. He had Jewish writings. 'Scripture' simply means 'writings'.
Which ones are important? Probably the ones Jesus used. Is there something different about them? Yes. They have a second layer of meaning hidden in prophetic riddle.
When Jesus read the writings, he did not see Adam, Moses and Abraham. He saw himself in them. this is only possible if they have double meaning.
The Apocrypha does not have the second layer; neither does Enoch.
To see the second layer, you must solve the riddles in Hebrew, though you can see much of it in any language. The writings Jesus used do not need other writings to interpret the riddle. They are self-contained. They do need the teaching of the Spirit to see in a verifiable and reproducible manner.
The reason there are so many interpretations is because people stopped listening.
Sola scriptura is not the right to be infallible in the your interpretation of the Bible. That statement alone disqualifies him from having even a sensible opinion on the matter,
I do not believe in Sola Scriptura. But I know what it means. It means that the written word is sufficient to discern the things of God. It speaks of the word, not your ability.
The Bible? which one. Bibles are collections of writings. They differ. You cannot have this conversation if you don't recognize that.
Jesus did not have a Bible. He had Jewish writings. 'Scripture' simply means 'writings'.
Which ones are important? Probably the ones Jesus used. Is there something different about them? Yes. They have a second layer of meaning hidden in prophetic riddle.
When Jesus read the writings, he did not see Adam, Moses and Abraham. He saw himself in them. this is only possible if they have double meaning.
The Apocrypha does not have the second layer; neither does Enoch.
To see the second layer, you must solve the riddles in Hebrew, though you can see much of it in any language. The writings Jesus used do not need other writings to interpret the riddle. They are self-contained. They do need the teaching of the Spirit to see in a verifiable and reproducible manner.
The reason there are so many interpretations is because people stopped listening.
Sola scriptura is not the right to be infallible in the your interpretation of the Bible. That statement alone disqualifies him from having even a sensible opinion on the matter,
I do not believe in Sola Scriptura. But I know what it means. It means that the written word is sufficient to discern the things of God. It speaks of the word, not your ability.
The Bible? which one. Bibles are collections of writings. They differ. You cannot have this conversation if you don't recognize that.
Jesus did not have a Bible. He had Jewish writings. 'Scripture' simply means 'writings'.
Which ones are important? Probably the ones Jesus used. Is there something different about them? Yes. They have a second layer of meaning hidden in prophetic riddle.
When Jesus read the writings, he did not see Adam, Moses and Abraham. He saw himself in them. this is only possible if they have double meaning.
The Apocrypha does not have the second layer; neither does Enoch.
To see the second layer, you must solve the riddles in Hebrew, though you can see much of it in any language. The writings Jesus used do not need other writings to interpret the riddle. They are self-contained. They do need the teaching of the Spirit to see in a verifiable and reproducible manner.
The reason there are so many interpretations is because people stopped listening.
Sola scriptura is not the right to be infallible in the your interpretation of the Bible. That statement alone disqualifies him from having even a sensible opinion on the matter,
I do not believe in Sola Scriptura. But I know what it means. It means that the written word is sufficient to discern the things of God. It speaks of the word, not your ability.
The Bible? which one. Bibles are collections of writings. They differ. You cannot have this conversation if you don't recognize that.
Jesus did not have a Bible. He had Jewish writings. 'Scripture' simply means 'writings'.
Which ones are important? Probably the ones Jesus used. Is there something different about them? Yes. They have a second layer of meaning hidden in prophetic riddle.
When Jesus read the writings, he did not see Adam, Moses and Abraham. He saw himself in them. this is only possible if they have double meaning.
The Apocrypha does not have the second layer; neither does Enoch.
To see the second layer, you must solve the riddles in Hebrew, though you can see much of it in any language. The writings Jesus used do not need other writings to interpret the riddle. They are self-contained. They do need the teaching of the Spirit to see in a verifiable and reproducible manner.
The reason there are so many interpretations is because people stopped listening.
Sola scriptura is not the right to be infallible in the your interpretation of the Bible. That statement alone disqualifies him from having even a sensible opinion on the matter,
I do not believe in Sola Scriptura. But I know what it means. It means that the written word is sufficient to discern the things of God. It speaks of the word, not your ability.
The Bible? which one. Bibles are collections of writings. They differ. You cannot have this conversation if you don't recognize that.
Jesus did not have a Bible. He had Jewish writings. 'Scripture' simply means 'writings'.
Which ones are important? Probably the ones Jesus used. Is there something different about them? Yes. They have a second layer of meaning hidden in prophetic riddle.
When Jesus read the writings, he did not see Adam, Moses and Abraham. He saw himself in them. this is only possible if they have double meaning.
The Apocrypha does not have the second layer; neither does Enoch.
To see the second layer, you must solve the riddles in Hebrew, though you can see much of it in any language. The writings Jesus used do not need other writings to interpret the riddle. They are self-contained. They do need the teaching of the Spirit to see in a verifiable and reproducible manner.
The reason there are so many interpretations is because people stopped listening.