TYB
>"anon" admits to being subject to peer pressure.
Anon has no peers, just some fellow schizos on the interwebs.
Anon would love to see a case going to SCOTUS with the same logic as 2A "historical interpretation".
If a person is protected by hate crime laws, affirmative action, etc., they are not a 'peer'. to someone without that protection.
It would create a yuge, beautiful shitshow as jews demanded jew juries, blacks demanded black juries, whites demanded white juries, and men demanded male juries.
They'd start battling TF out of each other to knock down each other's entitlements.
…but the most discriminated against classes (straight white males) could serve on any jury, because they don't have legal protections from the upper crust of nigger trannies.
Make it habben, you glorious faggots.